Invalid but untouchable? The zombie mining right that refuses to die

Tendele has operated the Somkhele mine since 2006. In 2022, its expansion plans were challenged in court by community groups that sought an interim interdict to halt Tendele’s preparatory mining activities at the mine.

24 Mar 2026 2 min read Dispute Resolution Alert Article

At a glance

  • In Mfolozi Community Environmental Justice Organisation and Others v Tendele Coal Mining (Pty) Ltd and Others (3518/2023P) [2023] ZAKZPHC 72; [2023] 3 All SA 768 (KZP) (13 July 2023) community groups sought an interim interdict to halt Tendele's preparatory mining activities at the Somkhele mine.
  • The High Court dismissed the application because although Tendele's mining right had been declared invalid in 2022, it was not set aside and therefore continued to exist "in fact".

In Mfolozi Community Environmental Justice Organisation and Others v Tendele Coal Mining (Pty) Ltd and Others (3518/2023P) [2023] ZAKZPHC 72; [2023] 3 All SA 768 (KZP) (13 July 2023), Bam J found severe deficiencies in scoping, environmental assessment and public participation, describing Tendele’s approach as “egregious” and akin to an “unbridled horse”. However, exercising her powers under section 172(1)(b) of the Constitution, she declared the mining right invalid but did not set it aside, instead remitting the appeal to the Minister of Mineral and Petroleum Resources (Minister).

In February 2023, Tendele issued notices to commence preparatory activities. The applicants sought an urgent interdict, arguing that Tendele could not proceed until all defects were remedied. Tendele countered that under the Oudekraal principle, its mining right remained operative because it was never set aside.

The court’s reasoning

The interdict failed on multiple grounds. First, the applicants could not establish a prima facie right. Since the mining right was declared invalid but not set aside, it continued to exist in fact and could authorise preparatory operations. Second, the applicants had an adequate alternative remedy under section 96(2)(a) of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002 as they could have applied to the Minister to suspend the mining right, but did not. Finally, the balance of convenience was neutral given the socio-economic consequences of halting mining.

Key takeaways

Invalid does not mean inoperative. Under the Oudekraal principle, an unlawful administrative act remains effective until formally set aside. Because Bam J declared Tendele’s mining right invalid but declined to set it aside, the right remained alive, giving Tendele legal footing for limited preparatory work while the Minister reconsiders the appeal. For affected communities, the contest shifts to the administrative arena. For mining companies, the case confirms that the Oudekraal principle offers powerful protection even when compliance failures are found.

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2026 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com.