The hammer is yet to go down on temporary employment services: Assign judgment taken on appeal to the Constitutional Court

On 10 July 2017, the Labour Appeal Court (LAC) overturned the Labour Court’s (LC) earlier decision, wherein the LC found that the deeming provision contained in s198A of the Labour Relations Act, No 66 of 1995 (LRA) gave rise to a dual employment relationship for purposes of the LRA between the temporary employment service (TES) and the client.

3 Aug 2017 1 min read Employment Alert Article

This dual employment relationship would for purposes of the LRA, find application after a period of three months and in relation to employees earning below the Basic Conditions of Employment Act, No 75 of 1997 (BCEA) threshold (R205,433.30 per annum).

In coming to its decision, the LAC overturned the dual employer interpretation and instead favoured what has been referred to as the “sole employer interpretation”, holding that after three months, and in relation to employees who earn below the BCEA threshold, the client becomes the statutory employer as “it would make no sense to retain the TES in the employment equation for an indefinite period if the client has assumed all the responsibilities that the TES had before the expiration of the three month period”.

As anticipated and on Monday 31 July 2017, the Confederation of Associations in the Private Employment Sector (CAPES) filed an application for leave to appeal in the Constitutional Court and against the judgment of the LAC.

When an application for leave to appeal is filed, the operation and/or effect of the judgment or order in question (the LAC decision in this case), is suspended pending the outcome of the appeal.

Accordingly, and until such time as the Constitutional Court adjudicates the appeal, the effect of the LAC decision will be suspended and the LC decision will remain applicable for the time being.

Watch this space for further updates.

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2024 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us