Contact

SA Corporate Real Estate Ltd and AFHCO Holdings Pty Ltd

Back to top

SA Corporate Real Estate Ltd and AFHCO Holdings Pty Ltd

Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr represented AFHCO Holdings Pty Ltd (AFHCO) in the establishment of a new joint venture company, AFHCO Consortium 2 Proprietary Limited held by AFHCO (60 percent) and JR 209 Proprietary Limited (JR209) (40 percent) for the acquisition by the joint venture of residential units to be constructed and developed by JR 209 with funding from AFHCO. 

11 Feb 2020 1 min read Featured work

This transaction involved a suite of complex legal agreements, including a subscription & shareholders’ agreement; an MOI; an agreement of sale; guarantees and a facility agreement. These agreements were required to establish the joint venture and to integrate the commercially agreed terms into the legal documentation.The transaction involved complex tax, funding and competition issues, which were resolved by our experienced team.

You might also be interested in

10 Mar 2023

by Chris Charter and Taigrine Jones

Many hands make ‘light’ work: Draft block exemptions for energy suppliers and users published

With (another) national state of disaster in place since 9 February 2023, on 8 March 2023 the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC) published for public comment draft block exemption regulations for energy suppliers and energy users (exemptions). “ Suppliers ” are any person or firm that supplies energy and related products and services. These include all forms of energy supply, related products (such as inverters or generators), inputs (such as coal) or services (such as storage or installation) in the supply of energy to users. “ Users ” are any person or firm that uses any form of energy supply.

Competition Law

3 min read

30 Aug 2023

by Alecia Pienaar and Margo-Ann Werner

ERA Bill finally tabled in Parliament: What comes next?

After much delay, the Electricity Regulation Amendment Bill (ERA Bill or Bill) was finally tabled in Parliament on 23 August 2023. The ERA Bill is perhaps the most critical regulatory piece of the puzzle in transitioning South Africa away from its centralised, vertically integrated electricity market, towards a more competitive model.

Projects & Energy

3 min read

18 Oct 2022

by Lucinde Rhoodie, Muwanwa Ramanyimi and Jenny Harwin

The thin line between being “fit and proper” and doing the job effectively!

In an insolvency enquiry, the commissioner is charged with the unenviable task of digging, probing, and essentially trying to ascertain where the skeletons are buried. Considering the interrogative role of the commissioner, under what circumstances can it be said that there was actual bias or a reasonable apprehension of bias on the part of the commissioner, that may warrant an application for recusal?

Dispute Resolution

6 min read

24 Jul 2023

by Thabang Rapuleng, Malesale Letwaba and Buhle Duma

A classic incongruent ruling on sanction

The matter of National Lotteries Commission v Mafonjo and Another (JR 48/2020) ZALCJHB 184 (23 June 2023) sets out what the Labour Court has termed an incongruent ruling on sanction.

Employment Law

2 min read

13 Mar 2023

Protecting an individual's right to strike amidst widespread violence

On 13 March 2023, the Labour Appeal Court (LAC) handed down a judgment in an urgent appeal against the judgment and order of the Labour Court handed down a week earlier that interdicted the national public service strike called upon by the National Education, Health and Allied Workers' Union (NEHAWU).

Employment Law

2 min read

11 Apr 2023

by Thabile Fuhrmann and Buhle Duma

To amend or not to amend: The effect of rectification on concursus creditorum

“A written agreement which fails to express accurately the true intention of the parties may be rectified so as to make it accord with the parties’ common intention. If the party seeking rectification can prove an actual agreement anterior to or contemporaneous with the writing with which the written agreement, owing to a mutual mistake, fails to conform, the court will rectify the erroneous instrument.” – Melamet J in Leyland (SA) (Pty) Ltd v Rex Evans Motors (Pty) Ltd n(4) SA 271 (WLD).

Dispute Resolution

8 min read

This website uses cookies to enhance the browsing experience. For more information, please see our Cookie Policy.

Accept Decline