SA Corporate Real Estate Ltd and AFHCO Holdings Pty Ltd

Home
Home
SA Corporate Real Estate Ltd and AFHCO Holdings Pty Ltd

SA Corporate Real Estate Ltd and AFHCO Holdings Pty Ltd

Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr represented AFHCO Holdings Pty Ltd (AFHCO) in the establishment of a new joint venture company, AFHCO Consortium 2 Proprietary Limited held by AFHCO (60 percent) and JR 209 Proprietary Limited (JR209) (40 percent) for the acquisition by the joint venture of residential units to be constructed and developed by JR 209 with funding from AFHCO.

11 Feb 2020 1 min read Featured work

Related services

Real Estate Law & Conveyancing

This transaction involved a suite of complex legal agreements, including a subscription & shareholders’ agreement; an MOI; an agreement of sale; guarantees and a facility agreement. These agreements were required to establish the joint venture and to integrate the commercially agreed terms into the legal documentation.The transaction involved complex tax, funding and competition issues, which were resolved by our experienced team.

THE TEAM BEHIND THE DEAL

Andries le Grange

Director

Competition Law

You might also be interested in

30 Apr 2025

by Ian Hayes, Yaniv Kleitman and Keagan Hyslop

MOI v Companies Act amendments: A fight best settled out of court

As the dust settles following the President’s belated Christmas gift of bringing the amendments to the Companies Act 71 of 2008 (Companies Act) into operation on 27 December 2024, it is clear that many companies are still grappling with the consequences of the amendments. An increasingly common issue is the inconsistencies these amendments bring about between the Companies Act (as amended) and a company’s memorandum of incorporation (MOI).

Corporate & Commercial Law

4 min read

7 May 2025

by Lucinde Rhoodie and Dipuo Titipana

Ignore me at your peril: Protecting vulnerable groups in eviction matters

In City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality and Others v Occupiers [of Portion 971 of the Farm Randjesfontein No 405] and Others (636/23) ZASCA 47 (23 April 2025), the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) was called upon to determine whether a court, as part of the just and equitable enquiry envisaged in section 4(7) of the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act 19 of 1998 (PIE Act), should consider an unlawful occupier’s right to earn a living

Dispute Resolution

4 min read

15 Jan 2025

by Tessa Brewis, Deepesh Desai, Jamie Oliver and Azola Ndongeni

Commencement of the Electricity Regulation Amendment Act 38 of 2024

The Electricity Regulation Amendment Act 38 of 2024 (ERA Act) was signed into law by the President of South Africa on 16 August 2024. On 18 December 2024, a governmental proclamation notice (236 of 2024) was published in Government Gazette 51778 in terms of which it was detailed that, in accordance with section 33 of the ERA Act, 1 January 2025 will be the date on which the ERA Act shall come into operation (save for amendments to the definitions of “ reticulation ” and “ distribution power systems ” in section 1 of the ERA Act, which will be dealt with by the President in a further proclamation in the Government Gazette in due course).

Projects & Energy

2 min read

8 Oct 2025

by Nelisiwe Khumalo and Safee-Naaz Siddiqi

Women in Competition Law

In this episode of our CDH Women Empowerment Series, Safee-Naaz Siddiqi, Senior Associate in the Knowledge Management practice speaks with Nelisiwe Khumalo, Senior Associate in the Competition Law practice.

Competition Law

16:58 Minutes

23 Apr 2025

by Vivien Chaplin and Gaby Wesson

A quick guide to B-BBEE ownership transactions in South Africa

The element of ownership is regarded as one of the most important elements of the broad-based black economic empowerment (B-BBEE) scorecard, as set out in the Codes of Good Practice issued in terms of the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act, No. 53 of 2003 (Codes). The ownership element is a key driver of a company’s B-BBEE level and, in some cases, a mandatory requirement for certain sectors of the economy, which are governed by bespoke sector charters (such as in the mining industry) that prescribe minimum ownership thresholds. It is also often a critical consideration in contracting, particularly in public procurement processes.

Corporate & Commercial Law

6 min read

4 Dec 2024

by Yaniv Kleitman and Menachem Gudelsky

Measure twice, cut once: Recent case law on how to remove company directors

In any war between factions of shareholders, the first battle typically plays out in respect of board composition, as that is the central decision-making organ of a company. The procedures regarding director removals are not necessarily very complex but can turn out that way if not followed surgically. The recent unreported judgments of Jones and Others v Delport and Others (2023/082594) (28 August 2024) and Sharp and Another v Buthelezi and Others (2024/088147) (18 September 2024), in the Gauteng High Court Local and Provincial Divisions, underline the importance of this and remind us of the sage advice, “ measure twice, cut once ”. Under the Companies Act 71 of 2008 (Companies Act), the removal of a director may occur either by their fellow directors under section 71(3) or via an ordinary resolution of the company’s shareholders under section 71(1). Each of these has different requirements andconsiderations.

Corporate & Commercial Law

5 min read