Beware! Breaching South Africa’s immigration laws has its consequences

The past few months have been plagued with anti-immigrant protests, with stern positions being taken against the presence of foreign nationals in South Africa. To address the civil unrest and concerns relating to this issue, on 7 June 2026 President Cyril Ramaphosa addressed the Nation (Presidential Address) on, amongst other things, the government’s approach on the crackdown on illegal immigration and violations of immigration and employment laws.

22 Jun 2026 6 min read Immigration Law Alert Article

At a glance

  • In light of Government’s strengthened approach to address illegal immigration, it is more important than ever for employers to understand the criminal consequences that may arise where they do not comply with South Africa's immigration laws.
  • This alert provides a practical overview of the consequences under the Immigration Act 13 of 2002 and signals the new regime that will follow if the proposed amendments to the Employment Services Act 4 of 2014 are enacted.
  • The criminal consequences of non-compliance are significant, span multiple statutory provisions, and include imprisonment and civil penalties of a magnitude not previously seen in South African immigration and employment law.

In light of Government’s strengthened approach to address illegal immigration, it is more important than ever for employers to understand the consequences that may arise where they do not comply with South Africa’s immigration laws. This alert provides a practical overview of the consequences under the Immigration Act 13 of 2002 (Immigration Act), as well as highlighting the new regime that will follow if the proposed amendments to the Employment Services Act 4 of 2014 (ES Act) are enacted.

Criminal offences under the Immigration Act

Section 49 of the Immigration Act outlines a comprehensive range of offences and corresponding penalties for various role players in the immigration space in respect of breaching certain of its provisions. The offences relevant to employers in relation to their employment of foreign nationals specifically are dealt with below with reference to their employment obligations under the Immigration Act.

Section 38(1) of the Immigration Act prohibits any person from employing:

  • an illegal foreigner;
  • a foreigner whose status does not authorise employment by that employer; or
  • a foreigner on terms, conditions or in a capacity different from those contemplated in the foreigner’s status.

Where an employer knowingly employs a foreigner in violation of the Immigration Act, they are guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to:

  • a fine or imprisonment not exceeding one year for a first conviction;
  • imprisonment not exceeding two years or a fine for a second conviction; and
  • imprisonment not exceeding five years without the option of a fine for a third or subsequent conviction.

Importantly, section 38(3) of the Immigration Act creates a statutory presumption in that where it is proved that a person was employed in violation of the provision, the employer is presumed to have known of the illegal employment at the time, unless they can show that (i) the person was employed in good faith; and (ii) the employer complied with the good faith obligation to ascertain that no illegal foreigners are in its employ. Stricter compliance is required of any employer who employs more than five employees or has previously been found guilty of an offence under this section of the Immigration Act.

Failure to comply with any duties and obligations under sections 38 to 46 of the Immigration Act constitutes an offence under section 49(6), punishable by a fine or imprisonment not exceeding five years.

While the Immigration Act currently provides for consequences for breaching its provisions, during the Presidential Address, President Ramaphosa stated that Government was considering increasing the penalties applicable to employers who violate the Immigration Act, with specific emphasis on imprisonment. This is to address the situation where some employers who, after being charged and found guilty of violating the Immigration Act, merely pay a fine and continue employing undocumented foreign nationals whom they exploit.

A new enforcement regime

The revised Employment Services Amendment Bill, 2026 (ESAB), which was published on 29 May 2026, also seeks to introduce substantially higher penalties for contravening South Africa’s immigration laws.

New obligations on employers

The proposed new section 12A of the ES Act would prohibit any person from employing a foreign national unless that foreign national is permitted to:

  • be employed in terms of a visa issued under the Immigration Act or the Refugees Act 130 of 1998; or
  • work in terms of any other legislation or binding international agreement.

Employers who employ foreign nationals will also be required to:

  • ascertain that the foreign national is entitled to work in South Africa and to perform the specific work for which they are engaged;
  • satisfy themselves, in the prescribed manner, that no persons in South Africa (other than foreign nationals) with the necessary skills to fill the vacancy before recruiting a foreign national;
  • prepare a skills transfer plan in respect of any position in which a foreign national is employed (unless the Minister of Employment and Labour determines otherwise by notice in the Government Gazette);
  • employ foreign nationals on terms and conditions of employment that are not inferior to those applicable to South African citizens; and
  • retain copies of the relevant visa or permit and all other documents showing that the foreign national is lawfully entitled to be employed in in South Africa.

The proposed new section 12E of the ES Act would further prohibit employers from requiring or permitting a foreign national to:

  • perform any work not authorised in terms of their visa or permit; or
  • engage in work contrary to the terms and conditions of their visa, permit or any applicable law.

Substantially increased civil penalties

The ESAB proposes a tiered civil penalty regime for contraventions of section 12A, section 12B(8) (exceeding a quota) and section 12E of the ES Act. On application by the Director-General, the Labour Court may impose:

  • R100,000 in respect of a first-time contravention;
  • R200,000 in respect of a previous contravention within the preceding three years; or
  • the greater of R1 million or 10% of the employer’s annual turnover in the preceding financial year for employers with two or more prior contraventions, taking into account any economic benefit derived from the contravention.

Additionally, the ESAB proposes to increase the existing maximum civil fine (for contraventions of the provisions listed in Schedule 3 to the ES Act) from R50,000 to R100,000.

Expanded enforcement by labour inspectors

The proposed amended section 49(1A) of the ES Act will empower labour inspectors (appointed under section 63 of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997) to monitor and enforce compliance with both the amended ES Act and section 38 of the Immigration Act, through an inter-ministerial agreement between the Minister of Home Affairs and the Minister of Employment and Labour. This cross-enforcement mechanism aligns with the phased recruitment of 10,000 new labour inspectors mentioned in the Presidential Address to assist with compliance inspections and enforcement and intensified inspections by the Department of Home Affairs, the Border Management Authority, the South African Police Service and the Department of Employment and Labour to identify undocumented migrants, with specific attention placed on targeting employers of undocumented workers.

The dedicated immigration court – implications for prosecution and enforcement

On 9 June 2026, the Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development announced plans to establish a dedicated immigration court near OR Tambo International Airport, which represents a fundamental shift in how immigration prosecutions and deportation proceedings will be processed. The current backlog in adjudicating immigration appeals and enforcement matters (which can take up to two years to resolve) has historically diluted the deterrent effect of the criminal regime under the Immigration Act.

A dedicated court is intended to:

  • expedite prosecutions of employers who contravene sections 38 and 42 of the Immigration Act;
  • speed up deportation orders and confirmation proceedings under section 34 of the Immigration Act;
  • process civil penalty applications brought by the Director-General under the proposed ESAB more efficiently; and
  • provide a specialised forum with the necessary expertise and capacity to deal with the increasingly complex intersection of immigration, labour and criminal law.

For employers and immigration practitioners, this means enforcement will move considerably faster than it has historically, and the risk of successful prosecution has materially increased.

Key takeaways

Against this backdrop, employers would be well-advised to proactively review their immigration compliance positions. The criminal consequences of non-compliance are significant, span multiple statutory provisions, and include imprisonment and, under the proposed ESAB regime, civil penalties of a magnitude not previously seen in South African immigration and employment law. With dedicated immigration courts on the horizon, the age of low-risk non-compliance is over.

Employers should therefore:

  • Regularly audit the immigration status of all foreign national employees, with particular attention to visa or permit expiry dates, visa conditions and whether the employee is authorised to work in the role and for the employer in question.
  • Discharge the good faith obligation under section 38(2) of the Immigration Act by implementing written compliance processes to verify and record the immigration status of all foreign employees, including keeping copies of relevant visas, permits and the employee’s passport.
  • Bear in mind that the statutory presumption in section 38(3) of the Immigration Act places the burden on the employer to disprove knowledge of illegal employment.
  • Be alive to the fact that directors and HR personnel may themselves face criminal liability, including imprisonment upon conviction, for offences under section 49(3) of the Immigration Act.

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2026 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com.