Contact

Personal income tax rates

Back to top

Personal income tax rates

Many predicted that, given the already small tax base in South Africa, the already high personal income tax rates, the significant increases in tax rates over recent years and the current state of the economy, there would be very few changes to personal income tax rates in the Budget Speech. In recent years, South Africans faced an increase in personal income tax rates (refer for example to the 45% tax bracket introduced for individuals earning R1,5 million and above), the value-added tax rate, dividend withholding tax rate and the capital gains tax inclusion rates.

21 Feb 2019 1 min read Special Edition Budget Speech Alert 2019 Article

During the Budget Speech the Minister proposed no changes to the personal income tax brackets (with no adjustment for inflation). In fact, it was specifically stated that, to limit the negative impact on economic growth, the Budget proposes no increase in tax rates in any category. Instead, the Minister proposes to increase tax collections by R12,8 billion by not adjusting tax brackets for inflation.

The Budget stated that tax administration problems partly explain poor revenue-collection. The proposal is to improve tax collections by restoring the efficiency of SARS. It was stated that, in the short-term, such improvements may be more effective in raising revenue than further substantial tax increases.

The primary, secondary and tertiary rebates will be increased by 1,1%, providing a small relief for inflation. The primary rebate will increase to R14,220, the secondary rebate will increase to R7,794 and the tertiary rebate will increase to R2,601.

The Minister proposes to increase the tax-free threshold for personal income taxes to R79,000 for taxpayers below the age of 65, R122,300 for taxpayers aged 65 years and older, and R136,750 for taxpayers aged 75 and older.

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2024 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com.

You might also be interested in

14 Jun 2023

by Albert Aukema and Ruan Jacobs

Striking the balance: The correct approach to competing public interest considerations

The Competition Amendment Act 18 of 2018 (Amendment Act), was signed into law on 13 February 2019 by President Cyril Ramaphosa. It made several significant amendments to the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (Competition Act), one of which was the amendment of section 12A by the addition of a paragraph (e) in subsection (3). This paragraph directs the competition authorities, when considering whether a merger can or cannot be justified on public interest grounds, to consider the effect that the merger will have on “ the promotion of a greater spread of ownership, in particular to increase the levels of ownership by historically disadvantaged persons and workers in firms in the market ”.

Competition Law

4 min read

24 Jul 2023

by Fiona Leppan and Biron Madisa

Criminal charges laid by employer? An employer can still take disciplinary action!

The Labour Court held that criminal charges laid by the employer against an employee can never stand in the way of that employer subjecting the employee to a disciplinary enquiry in the workplace in respect of the same charges.

Employment Law

12:31 Minutes

19 Oct 2023

by Puleng Mothabeng

Tempers continue to cool: Are uniform allowances (for nurses) taxable?

The inclusion of any part of an allowance paid or payable in an employee’s taxable income is governed by section 8(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 (Act).

Tax & Exchange Control

3 min read

28 Sep 2023

by Puleng Mothabeng

The fight continues: Agrizzi gets to keep his money to pay for his medical bills

In a previous Tax Alert , we considered the judgment delivered by Judge Basson in Commissioner for the South African Revenue Services v Angelo Agrizzi and Another (45008/2021) ZAGPPHC 604 in relation to the repatriation application that was brought by the South African Revenue Service (SARS). In terms of the application, SARS was seeking an order to compel Angelo Agrizzi to repatriate his assets located in Italy to satisfy his outstanding tax debt.

Tax & Exchange Control

8 min read

22 Jan 2024

by Anli Bezuidenhout and Malesela Letwaba

Boardrooms not court rooms

Boardrooms are not court rooms! In today's podcast, Anli Bezuidenhout and Malesela Letwaba discuss the differences, advantages, disadvantages, and application of formal disciplinary procedures vis-a-vis informal disciplinary procedures.

Employment Law

07:10 Minutes

10 May 2023

by Belinda Scriba and Katekani Mashamba

Orthogonal tactics to try save a sinking ship

People rarely abandon a ship unless they have absolutely no alternative. The same can be said of some affected parties even when it is clear that the business rescue process has failed. This was again demonstrated in the recent Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) judgment of Louis N O and Others v Fenwick N O and Others (598/2021) ZASCA 59, where certain affected parties pursued an orthogonal interpretation of the legislation to try rescue (every pun intended) the business rescue of Louis Group SA (Pty) Limited (Company).

Business Rescue, Restructuring & Insolvency

5 min read

This website uses cookies to enhance the browsing experience. For more information, please see our Cookie Policy.

Accept Decline