Quintin Honey participated in a M&A panel discussion

Ignore me at your peril: Protecting vulnerable groups in eviction matters

Dipuo Titipana, Associate in the Dispute Resolution practice recently joined Koketso Sachane on SAfm where he discussed 'Ignore me at your peril: Protecting vulnerable groups in eviction matters – Supreme Court ruling reshapes eviction proceedings.

Fixed-term contracts and the termination of third-party service relationships

Big boost for a South African green hydrogen economy as new tools released

On 17 February 2025 two key environmental planning tools were published with the aim of guiding and supporting the responsible development of green hydrogen projects which will play an important role in South Africa’s commitment to achieving a Just Energy Transition by replacing the use of fossil fuels in the fertilizer industry and in other hard-to-abate industries such as the heavy mobility, steel and cement industries.

How inspectors should conduct inspections under the OHSA

The recent Labour Court decision in Truworths Limited v The Chief Inspector: Occupational Health and Safety, Department of Employment and Labour and Another Case Number: J1597/21 has provided clarification on the authority of labour inspectors and the correct application of the “reasonably practicable” standard under the Occupational Health and Safety Act 85 of 1993 (OHSA). The court’s decision considered whether inspectors issuing contravention notices were properly certified, and whether their interpretation of workplace seating requirements under the Facilities Regulations 2004 (Facilities Regulations) was legally sound. The court also clarified what is meant by an appeal in terms of section 35(3) of the OHSA and how a court should approach such an appeal where an aggrieved party challenges the findings of an inspector.

50/50 shareholders and oppressive conduct: When some shareholders are more equal than others

A fundamental principle of South African company law is “ majority rules ” – shareholders and directors are bound by the decisions of the majority even where such decisions are not in their interest. However, recognising the potential for unfair abuse of such a principle, the Companies Act 71 of 2008 (Companies Act) devised section 163, which allows a director or shareholder of a company to apply to court for relief from oppressive conduct of the company or a person related to it that unfairly disregards or prejudices the interests of the applicant. Section 163 therefore paints the picture of a majority shareholder abusing its ability to control the company to unfairly bully or oppress minority shareholders. But what happens if the shareholders are equals – can a 50/50 shareholder be oppressed by their equal? This was the question before the High Court in Van der Watt v Schoeman and Others 91 SA 531 (ECGq).

Industry update: Change in air service licensing process

In a significant shift for South Africa’s aviation sector, the Minister of Transport has announced a crucial change regarding the processing of Foreign Operator Permit applications and Air Service Licence applications.