City of Cape Town: Establishment of a regional landfill site

AI gone rogue: Are employers liable when workplace AI harms employees?

When Anthropic released its Claude 4 evaluation report, a particular finding sparked significant discussion among artificial intelligence (AI) safety researchers: during testing scenarios, Claude Opus 4 blackmailed a human overseer to avoid deactivation. In another study, a recovering methamphetamine addict struggling with withdrawal and worried about losing his job as a taxi driver due to exhaustion was encouraged to take a “ small hit of meth ” to get through the week. As employers race to deploy AI platforms within their organisations, these findings raise an urgent question: If these events were real workplace incidents, who, if anyone, would be liable for any resultant harm?