The Labour Court draws the line on interdicting unprotected strikes in Boomerang Fruits v MKP

The recent decision of the Labour Court in Boomerang Fruits (Pty) Ltd v uMkhonto weSizwe (MKP) and Others [2025] JDR2025-061014 (LC) provides timely clarification on the legal thresholds for interdicting unprotected strikes and the limits of third-party involvement, particularly by political parties, in industrial disputes. The judgment reaffirms the legal materiality of procedural norms under the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (LRA), as amended, and outlines the risks for entities that engage in conduct akin to that of a trade union without being recognised as such.

21 Jul 2025 1 min read Employment Law Alert Article

At a glance

  • The recent decision in Boomerang Fruits (Pty) Ltd v uMkhonto weSizwe (MKP) and Others [2025] JDR2025-061014 (LC) provides timely clarification on the legal thresholds for interdicting unprotected strikes and the limits of third-party involvement, particularly by political parties, in industrial disputes.
  • The Labour Court sent a strong message that political parties may not conduct themselves as substitutes for trade unions and that employers have legal recourse where they do.
  • It found that the uMkhonto weSizwe Party had acted far beyond an advisory role. It performed functions typically undertaken by a registered trade union by representing workers in mediation attempts and orchestrating a strike.

14906 Jpegs - Employment 21 July 20256-1

14906 Jpegs - Employment 21 July 20257

14906 Jpegs - Employment 21 July 20258

14906 Jpegs - Employment 21 July 20259

14906 Jpegs - Employment 21 July 202510

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2025 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com.