Hot off the bench: Constitutional Court confirms it is not necessary to hold a pre-suspension hearing
The court went on to hold that although there is the additional consideration of prejudice, this is ameliorated by the suspension being on full pay for the period of the suspension.
Accordingly, the Constitutional Court has confirmed that there is no requirement to afford the employee an opportunity to make representations prior to the implementation of his/her precautionary suspension by an employer.
This is a victorious outcome for Employers who have to date adopted the practice of holding pre-suspension hearings and then only after receiving submissions, deciding whether to implement the precautionary suspension or not. Clarity has finally been provided by our top court.
The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2024 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com.
Subscribe
We support our clients’ strategic and operational needs by offering innovative, integrated and high quality thought leadership. To stay up to date on the latest legal developments that may potentially impact your business, subscribe to our alerts, seminar and webinar invitations.
Subscribe