Contact

Employment Matters

Back to top

Employment Matters

29 Jul 2013 1 min read Article

In this issue

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2024 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com.

You might also be interested in

5 Mar 2024

by Belinda Scriba and Serisha Hariram

When does the proverbial clock begin to tick under section 7(1) of PAJA?

A ruling was made by the Constitutional Court at the end of last year in Sasol Chevron Holdings Limited v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Services ZACC30, confirming that the 180-day period afforded by section 7(1) of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 (PAJA) starts running from the date that reasons for the decision are provided with sufficient detail to allow the offended party to file an objection against the decision. A party’s request for more detailed reasons does not afford that party room to argue that the 180-day period only starts running once those more detailed reasons are provided.

Dispute Resolution

3 min read

14 Aug 2024

by Reece May

Price personalisation or price discrimination: Can your computer tell the difference

Reece May, Senior Associate in the Competition Law practice joined Jeremy Maggs on Hot 1027 to discuss Price personalisation or price discrimination: Can your computer tell the difference?

Competition Law

20 Jun 2024

by Petr Erasmus

Duty-free, profit-heavy? How prices at SA airports duty-free stack up

Petr Erasmus, Director in the Tax & Exchange Control practice was featured in Financial Mail discussing Duty-free, profit-heavy? How prices at SA airports duty-free stack up

1 min read

24 Jun 2024

by Lucinde Rhoodie

The ball is in our courts: How section 20(9) of the Companies Act empowers courts to unmask corporate identity

Lucinde Rhoodie, Director in the Dispute Resolution practice joined Simon Brown on Moneyweb and was also featured on Daily Maverick discussing The ball is in our courts: How section 20(9) of the Companies Act empowers courts to unmask corporateidentity. 

1 min read

27 Sep 2024

by Gretchen Barkhuizen-Barbosa and Emily West

Estate Planning for women-owned businesses

Join Trusts & Estates practice Director, Emily West as she sits down with Practice Head, Gretchen Barkhuizen-Barbosa to discuss a critical yet often overlooked topic: Estate Planning for Women-Owned Businesses in South Africa.

Trusts & Estates Law

7 Nov 2024

by Heinrich Louw

Understatement penalties and the benefit of tax opinions: A review of the Thistle Trust saga

We previously reported on the judgment by the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in the case of CSARS v The Thistle Trust (516/2021) ZASCA 153 (7 November 2022) in our Tax alert of 24 November 2022. We also specifically focused on the issue of understatement penalties that arose in that case in our Tax alert of 1 December 2022.

Tax & Exchange Control

7 min read

This website uses cookies to enhance the browsing experience. For more information, please see our Cookie Policy.

Accept Decline