Contact

Chambers Global 2026: CDH Dispute Resolution practice rankings

Back to top

Chambers Global 2026: CDH Dispute Resolution practice rankings

We are grateful for our clients’ ongoing trust and invaluable feedback, which have contributed significantly to the success of our Dispute Resolution practice in the Chambers Global 2026 rankings.

24 Feb 2026 1 min read Dispute Resolution Alert Article

At a glance

  • In South Africa, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyer has upheld our Band 2 ranking in Dispute Resolution in the Chambers Global 2026 rankings. In Kenya, our Dispute Resolution practice has achieved its inaugural ranking as Band 5.
  • We are grateful for our clients' ongoing trust and invaluable feedback, which have contributed significantly to the success of our Dispute Resolution practice in the rankings.

In South Africa, we have upheld our Band 2 ranking in Dispute Resolution. In Kenya, our Dispute Resolution practice has achieved its inaugural ranking as Band 5.

This recognition underscores our unwavering commitment to delivering technically rigorous and commercially pragmatic advice across complex disputes and regulatory matters. Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr is a leading force in significant disputes, representing both local and international clients.

Beyond commercial litigation, we offer counsel on contentious corporate and white-collar investigations. Our clients span diverse sectors, including energy and natural resources, telecoms, retail, gaming, and financial services, with particular expertise in highly regulated industries. Our team also boasts extensive experience in alternative dispute resolution, including arbitration and mediation.

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2026 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com.

You might also be interested in

27 Jan 2026

by Timothy Smit, Paige Winfield and Claudia Grobler

Out for the count – National Consumer Tribunal knocks out claim against “Rhodes”

A recent National Consumer Tribunal (Tribunal) ruling is a reminder that although our courts do not place over reliance on rigid technicalities, there are certain procedural defects that cannot parry knock-out blows.

Dispute Resolution

3 min read

25 Sep 2025

by Njeri Wagacha and Wambui Kimamo

Employment considerations in Kenyan merger control

When reviewing mergers, the Competition Authority of Kenya (CAK) doesn’t just look at market dominance and consumer protection, it also pays close attention to employment considerations. Under section 46(2) of the Competition Act Cap. 504, the CAK, as the primary regulator, is mandated to assess whether a proposed merger is likely to have adverse effects onemployment. 

Employment Law

5 min read

4 Sep 2025

by Nadeem Mahomed, Chantell De Gouveia and Ayesha Karjieker

Contempt, targets and the dispute over Employment Equity: Solidarity v Minister of Employment and Labour

On 28 June 2023 Solidarity and the erstwhile Minister of Employment and Labour concluded a settlement agreement, mediated by the CCMA, as part of a complaint lodged with the International Labour Organisation (ILO) objecting to the employment equity interventions by theGovernment. 

Employment Law

3 min read

4 Dec 2025

by Brigitta Mangale, Elgene Roos and Sibonokuhle Baart

Beyond 16 Days Podcast Series | Pride in Practice Part 2 – Unpacking LGBTQIA+ Inclusion in the 16 Days of Activism Campaign

This episode highlights the vital role of LGBTQIA+ inclusion in South Africa’s fight against gender-based violence and femicide.

Pro Bono & Human Rights

14:36 Minutes

11 Jun 2025

by Yaniv Kleitman and Menachem Gudelsky

Courts not so unanimous about unanimous assent

In the recent case of Cowan and Others v Norton and Others (2024/090281) ZAGPJHC 358 (25 March 2025) the Johannesburg High Court considered the validity of company actions ratified by the unanimous assent of the shareholders, without (at the outset) passing resolutions at a shareholders’ meeting or in writing by way of a section 60round-robin. 

Corporate & Commercial Law

4 min read

25 Nov 2025

by Alex Kanyi

Webinar Recording | Expense deductibility and income reporting: preparing for KRA’s validation in the era of eTIMS

The webinar brought together a panel of specialists to unpack KRA’s recent notice on the validation of income and expenses in income-tax returns.

Tax & Exchange Control

1:09:52 Minutes

This website uses cookies to enhance the browsing experience. For more information, please see our Cookie Policy.

Accept Decline