Judgment reserved on the future of the extension of bargaining council agreements

15 Aug 2013 2 min read Article

On Tuesday 13 August, the North Gauteng High Court reserved judgment on
whether s32 of the Labour Relations Act, No 66 of 1995 was unconstitutional.
This section of the Act empowers the Minister of Labour to extend agreements
concluded in a Bargaining Council to non-parties.

According to Faan Coetzee from the Employment practice at Cliffe Dekker
Hofmeyr,  "The Confederation of Associations in the Private Employment
Sector (Capes), with other parties, are applying to court to declare this
section unconstitutional and on other grounds apply to have an agreement
regulating Labour Broker employees in the industry set aside. The Motor
Industry Bargaining Council, Minister of Labour and Numsa, who are parties
to the Council, are opposing the application."

The judgment will have a profound effect on the presence of labour brokers
in the motor industry as the agreement, which is the subject of the
application, phases out the use of labour provided by labour brokers. The
"ban" on labour brokers, as the applicants argued, will be set aside if the
applicants are successful with the challenge on the particular agreement.

Freedom Under the Law has launched a similar application against all
Bargaining Councils and the Minister to declare S32 unconstitutional. This
application is limited to the constitutional challenge and is not yet ready
to be heard in Court.

Coetzee notes that both cases hold implications for all bargaining councils.
The extension of their agreements is important to the councils and if the
Capes application is successful in respect of the challenge to S32 all the
bargaining councils whose agreements have been extended will be affected. If
the application is successful only in respect of Mibco's one agreement
regulating labour brokers, it will affect Mibco only.

The Capes matter is the first opportunity for the court to consider the
constitutionality of s32," he adds.

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2024 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com.