Contact

Is your link with your employer a permanent one? Addressing the question of off-duty misconduct

Back to top

Is your link with your employer a permanent one? Addressing the question of off-duty misconduct

The judgment in IMATU obo Sauls v City of Cape Town and others (C485/2024) [2026] ZALCCT 10 (22 January 2026) outlined that off-duty misconduct does not automatically justify disciplinary action.

16 Feb 2026 07:15 Minutes Podcast
Is your link with your employer a permanent one? Addressing the question of off-duty misconduct

Is your link with your employer a permanent one? Addressing the question of off-duty misconduct

Podcast

Is your link with your employer a permanent one? Addressing the question of off-duty misconduct

Podcast

00:00 00:00
Download MP3

Employers must establish a clear nexus between the employee’s conduct and the employer’s operations, reputation, or working relationship.

In addition, the employer must demonstrate a legitimate and protectable interest in regulating the off-duty misconduct in question. Without both elements, disciplinary action and dismissal may be found to be substantively unfair.

This judgment illustrates that courts continue to emphasize the importance of carefully assessing these factors before taking action against employees for conduct occurring outside the workplace.

Thabang Rapuleng and Thato Maruapula in the Employment Law practice discuss the judgment.

Click here to listen to the podcast.

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2026 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com.

You might also be interested in

21 Feb 2025

by Jacquie Cassette and Elgene Roos

Unlocking citizenship: Overcoming irregular birth certificates

Nearly a decade after the coming into effect of various amendments to the South African Citizenship Act 88 of 1995 (Citizenship Act), which included a new ground of citizenship through the insertion of section 4(3) the Department of Home Affairs (Department) continues to impose arbitrary requirements that create unnecessary barriers to deserving applicants seeking to enforce their right to citizenship under section 4(3) of the act. This pattern of deprivation not only violates the clear provisions set forth in the Citizenship Act, but also effectively undermines the rule of law by denying individuals their legitimate rights entrenched in our Constitution, 1996. It raises serious concerns about the integrity and fairness of the implementation of the legal framework governing citizenship.

Pro Bono & Human Rights

7 min read

25 Jun 2025

by Njeri Wagacha, Alex Kanyi, Arnold Mutisya, Denis Maina and Prince Kiptoo

Kenya publishes draft Regulations for Public Benefit Organisations

The draft Public Benefits Organisations Regulations, 2025 (Draft Regulations) were unveiled by the Cabinet Secretary for Interior and National Administration (Cabinet Secretary) under the Public Benefits Organisations Act 18 of 2013 (PBO Act) on 5 June 2025.

5 min read

5 Aug 2025

by Nuhaa Amardien, Claudia Moser and Zenande Mnyamana

No more free pass: Electronic service to hold foreign peregrini accountable

The common law position on the establishment of jurisdiction when dealing with a foreign peregrinus (a party that is not resident or domiciled in South Africa) was recently developed in the High Court (HC) case of The Financial Sector Conduct Authority v The Financial Services Tribunal and Others (009838/2023) ZAGPPHC 675 (9 July 2025).

Dispute Resolution

3 min read

18 Feb 2025

by Corné Lewis and Ledile Maloka

Show me the money

In the case of National Director of Public Prosecutions v Dhurgasamy JOL 60116 (GJ), the National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP) applied for a forfeiture order under section 53, alternatively section 50 read with section 48, of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act 121 of 1998 (POCA). The application sought to declare certain property, specifically USD 630,700 in cash seized at OR Tambo International Airport on 11 September 2018, forfeit to the state. The Gauteng Division of the High Court in Johannesburg delivered judgment on 26 July 2023, granting the forfeiture order under section 50 of POCA. The court found that, on a balance of probabilities, the seized cash constituted the proceeds of unlawful activities, specifically violations of exchange control regulations and involvement in money laundering operations. The respondent failed to provide a credible explanation for the lawful origin of the funds, and his claims of obtaining the money through a loan for business purposes were unsubstantiated and lacked supporting evidence. The court noted inconsistencies and improbabilities in his account, leading to the conclusion that the funds were indeed derived from unlawful activities.

Dispute Resolution

2 min read

21 May 2025

by Nastascha Harduth, Gerhard Badenhorst and Mbali Mncube

Game-changing ruling: Companies in business rescue just scored a major victory over SARS

In a landmark decision delivered on 12 May 2025, the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) ruled that the South African Revenue Service (SARS) cannot apply set-off of value-added tax (VAT) refunds resulting from trading activities post business rescue, against tax debts that were incurred before the commencement of business rescue proceedings. This ruling came in Henque 3935 CC t/a PQ Clothing Outlet v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (846/2023) ZASCA 56, a case that has significant implications for companies undergoing business rescue.

Corporate Debt, Turnaround & Restructuring

7 min read

13 Nov 2025

by Reece May and Puleng Mothabeng

Unlocking value in commercial transactions while avoiding the pitfalls

Tax structuring isn’t an afterthought or an exercise to be delegated to accountants once the commercial deal is done – it’s a strategic imperative that can make or break the deal. Whether you are acquiring a company or restructuring a corporate group for operational efficiency, evaluating transactions through a tax lens alongside commercial considerations can ensure additional efficiencies. When executed properly with genuine commercial substance and where obtaining tax benefits is not the sole or main purpose, sophisticated tax planning can preserve substantial working capital that would otherwise be consumed by immediate tax liabilities, enable more competitive acquisition pricing, facilitate multi-step transactions that achieve optimal outcomes, and provide crucial flexibility in structuring that commercial considerations alone cannot deliver.

Competition Law

12 min read

This website uses cookies to enhance the browsing experience. For more information, please see our Cookie Policy.

Accept Decline