CSARS v Virgin Mobile South Africa (Pty) Ltd [2025] ZASCA 77

CSARS v Virgin Mobile South Africa (Pty) Ltd [2025] ZASCA 77

Podcast

CSARS v Virgin Mobile South Africa (Pty) Ltd [2025] ZASCA 77

Podcast

00:00 00:00

Download MP3

Mariska explains that the judgment sheds light on how the Tax Court will interpret the interplay between Rule 52 and Rule 56 of the Tax Court Rules going forward, both of which deal with missed deadlines and noncompliance with court procedures.

In this particular matter, Mariska says that SARS missed a critical deadline. After a significant amount of time had passed, the taxpayer filed a Rule 56 notice requiring SARS to produce the necessary documents within 15 days.

Mariska further explains that, as with any litigation, there are procedural rules that impose strict deadlines for filing various pleadings in the Tax Court. Rule 52 allows a defaulting party to request condonation for late filings. If granted, they may proceed. Rule 56 lets the prejudiced party demand compliance within 15 days or seek a default judgment if no condonation is sought.

Click here to listen