Contact

Pro Bono & Human Rights Annual Newsletter

Back to top

Pro Bono & Human Rights Annual Newsletter

In 2011, as part of its commitment to being a good corporate citizen and to further its strong commitment to promoting access to justice and the rights and values in our Constitution, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr Inc (CDH) set up a dedicated Pro Bono and Human Rights Practice (the Pro Bono Practice). Our mandate is to provide dedicated pro bono representation of the highest standard to deserving individuals, communities, NGOs and other organisations whose mandates include the promotion of human rights or the public interest.

9 Dec 2022 2 min read Newsletter Article

At a glance

  • Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr Inc (CDH) established a Pro Bono and Human Rights Practice in 2011 to promote access to justice and uphold constitutional rights.
  • The practice has grown significantly in size, profile, and impact, with notable achievements and awards.
  • CDH donated over 11,168 hours (worth more than R25.5 million) in pro bono legal services in 2022.

The Pro Bono Practice began as a one-person practice based in Johannesburg, but since then has grown significantly not only in size, but also in profile, reach and impact. 2022 ushered in significant growth of our practice. At the beginning of the year our Cape Town representative Brigitta Mangale was promoted from senior associate to director, while Gift Xaba, an associate in our Johannesburg practice was promoted to senior associate. We also welcomed our newest member Elgene Roos, who joined our Johannesburg practice as a senior associate in May. Ours is now a truly thriving and vibrant practice which I believe is up there with the best, and of which I am proud to be a part and to lead. Perhaps testament to our growing impact and recognition are the awards we / CDH received at the 2021 ProBono.Org Awards hosted this January (2021), in which we won the large law firm of the year award for 2020, as well as several special mentions, including for our assistance provided to the Jose brothers in a long struggle to enforce their section 4(3) right to citizenship.

Despite the increase in our size, requests for pro bono assistance as well as CSR / developmental support grow by the day, and far exceed our capacity, or that of members of our firm from other practice areas, whom we encourage to assist in dedicating time to pro bono work. Accordingly, our goal is to increasingly forge relationships and partnerships with other role players in order to maximise our reach and impact, and to carefully consider how we best use our resources. While our aim is to assist those most in need as best we can, our objective is simultaneously to promote the rule of law and the enforcement of the rights and constitutional principles upon which our democracy was founded, and on which its continued existence depends. 

The cases and initiatives we have chosen to focus on in this newsletter highlight some of the best of our year’s work.

As always, I thank my dedicated team members, and colleagues in other practice areas who have contributed significantly to the firm’s truly impressive pro bono achievements during 2022. 

The Pro Bono Practice takes great pride and pleasure in reporting that, collectively CDH donated over 11,168 hours (in excess of R25,5 million) in pro bono legal services to deserving individuals, organisations and causes during 2022.

Click here to read the newsletter.

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2025 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com.

You might also be interested in

6 Nov 2024

by Yaniv Kleitman, Marelise van der Westhuizen and Roxanne Bain

Making sense of beneficial ownership thresholds: The FIC Act versus the Companies Act

Both the Financial Intelligence Centre Act 38 of 2001 (FIC Act) and the Companies Act 71 of 2008 (Companies Act) create legal regimes relating to the uncovering of beneficial ownership of an entity. The former requires accountable institutions (as defined) to verify the beneficial owners of their clients, and the latter requires certain types of companies (namely, non-affected companies 1 ) to keep record of and disclose their beneficial owners to the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC).

Corporate & Commercial Law

6 min read

29 May 2025

by Heinrich Louw

No hiding from tax debt: court backs SARS in major legal win

Heinrich Louw, Director in the Tax & Exchange Control, was recently featured on Channel Africa, where he discussed 'No hiding from tax debt: court backs SARS in major legal win.'

Tax & Exchange Control

08:05 Minutes

12 May 2025

by Imraan Mahomed and Lee Masuku

Constructive dismissal: The end result of complaints, grievances and toxicity in the workplace

It has become quite routine for employers to simply dismiss a possible claim of constructive dismissal. This is because it is one of the more peculiar forms of dismissal claims and, statistically, a form of claim that does not easily find success at arbitration. In short, for an employee to succeed they must show that the resignation was because their continued employment had become intolerable at the instance of the employer. While the bar is high, the risk of a successful constructive dismissal claim can be serious for an employer. Also, an employee is not limited to compensation and may seek reinstatement (despite the resignation). So, our law is well advanced in the protection of employees who are subjected to a constructivedismissal. 

Employment Law

12 min read

30 Oct 2024

by Roy Barendse and Divina Naidoo

Dying for a cash in: Life insurance claims amid criminal investigations

South Africa grapples with one of the highest crime rates in the world, driven by a multitude of factors. The South African Police Service (SAPS) is significantly outnumbered by offenders, and its efforts are hampered by a lack of resources and inadequate training. Unfortunately, this situation has become a norm rather than an anomaly for SouthAfricans. 

Insurance Law

7 min read

2 Jun 2025

Constitutional challenge to the Employment Equity Amendment Act: A summary analysis

As we work towards compliance with the Employment Equity Act and await the judgment in the Democratic Alliance's application challenging the introduction of sectoral numerical targets, the following is a summary of the arguments presented by the respective parties.

Employment Law

1 min read

5 Aug 2024

by Nadeem Mahomed and Aadil Patel

Labour Court judgment on retrenchment: must I issue a written notice?

Must an employer issue a written notice in terms of section 189(3) before initiating a retrenchment process? Some commentators suggest that the case in Padayachee v Serere and Others (JR1162/21) ZALCJHB 254 (20 June 2024) is authority for the view that you may do so provided certain facts are present. The message from us: ISSUE THE SECTION 189(3) WRITTEN NOTICE BEFORE EMBARKING ON A RETRENCHMENT PROCESS. This is the cautious approach.

Employment Law

2 min read

This website uses cookies to enhance the browsing experience. For more information, please see our Cookie Policy.

Accept Decline