11 October 2021 by , and Employment Law Alert

Ethnicity and board structure

The Employment and Labour Relations Court has quashed a state authority decision to appoint three members of one ethnic community to a board. In the recent case of Law Society of Kenya v Chairman, Nairobi Metropolitan Area Council and Three Others; Mary Waithigieni Chege and Two Others (Interested Parties) [2021] eKLR, the court held that it is unconstitutional, unlawful, and irregular to compose a board of members from one ethnic community, as this disregards the diverse fabric of Kenya and the national values espoused in the Constitution of Kenya, 2010. The court relied on Article 232 and Article 10 of the Constitution, reasoning that these provisions obligated the state authority to apply national values and principles of governance, such as social justice, inclusiveness, equality, integrity, non-discrimination and transparency.

The court’s judgment related to state agencies; however, the legal basis of this decision, being the principles of non-discrimination and equality, may conceivably introduce a new standard for private employers to consider when structuring a board. Notably, the Employment Act, 2007 (Employment Act) does not set out board composition requirements for private employers. However, the Capital Markets (Corporate Governance) (Market Intermediaries) Regulations, 2011 (Regulations) set out some guidelines to be followed. For example, sections 3 and 4 of the Regulations provide that a board shall be composed of:

  • persons who are fit and proper to hold such a position;
  • persons who have undergone relevant training on corporate governance within six months of appointment; and
  • at least one-third of directors who are not employed by the company, or associated with any of its management, advisers, or consultants, among other such requirements.

Although the Employment Act is silent on this matter, a wide view of the implications of this case, read alongside the provisions of the Constitution and the requirements in the Regulations, suggest that ethnic diversity may be a growing consideration for all when structuring a board. Therefore, even though this judgment was premised on Articles 10 and 232 of the Constitution, which relate to public entities, it is likely that the reasoning in this case can also be applied to private employers because the national values referred to, such as non-discrimination and equality, bind private employers as much as they do state agencies, as set forth in Article 27(5) of the Constitution.

We recommend that private employers take note of this decision and prepare to consider ethnic diversity as a possible factor when structuring a board. As stated by the learned judge in this case, doing so would ensure that “the evils of old which Kenyans opted to do away with in the Constitution”, are indeed done away with.

We are happy to assist in creating and advising on board structure requirements and policies in light of this decision.

download PDF

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter.

We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages.

Please refer to the full terms and conditions on the website.

Copyright © 2021 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com

You may also be interested in