4 October 2019 by Tax & Exchange Control Alert

On the way to Parliament: National Treasury’s response to submissions received regarding the Draft TLAB and Draft TALAB

On 30 October 2019, the Minister of Finance (Minister) will deliver the Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement (MTBPS) in Parliament. It is anticipated that the Minister will also table several bills on the same day, including the Taxation Laws Amendment Bill, 2019 (TLAB) and the Tax Administration Laws Amendment Bill, 2019 (TALAB), pursuant to which the TLAB and TALAB will be considered by and eventually adopted by Parliament.

The tabling of the TLAB and TALAB in Parliament follow on from the publication of the 2019 Draft Taxation Laws Amendment Bill (Draft TLAB) and the 2019 Draft Tax Administration Laws Amendment Bill (Draft TALAB), which were published on 21 July 2019 and the public consultation process, during which the public was given an opportunity to make submissions on the Draft TLAB and Draft TALAB. We reported on the publication of the Draft TLAB and Draft TALAB in our Tax & Exchange Control Alert of 25 July 2019. In the latter alert and in our Tax & Exchange Control Alerts of 1 August 2019, 22 August 201913 September 2019 and 19 September 2019, we discussed some of the proposed amendments in the Draft TLAB and Draft TALAB, including those pertaining to the controlled foreign companies (CFC) provisions in the Income Tax Act No 58 of 1962 (IT Act).

Pursuant to the public consultation process, National Treasury (NT) prepared a response document on the Draft TLAB, Draft TALAB and the 2019 Draft Rates and Monetary Amounts and Amendment of Revenue Laws Bill, which was published on 18 September 2019 and sets out its responses to the key issues raised during the public consultation process (Response Document). In this week’s Alert, we briefly discuss NT’s response to some of the submissions made by the public regarding the proposed amendments to the CFC provisions and to the provisions regarding public benefit organisations (PBOs) in s30 of the Act.

CFC provisions

As discussed in our Tax & Exchange Control Alert of 25 July 2019, NT proposed reducing the comparable tax exemption threshold in s9D of the Act from 75% to 67.5% as the current threshold of 75% is no longer comparable and therefore provides little or no assistance to cater for South African CFCs in the current world order.

According to the Response Document, one of the submissions NT received argued that It has become globally acceptable that a corporate tax rate of 15% and higher is not considered to be “low”. Using 15% as a reasonable benchmark, it is the taxpayer’s view that an appropriate comparable tax exemption would be 53.5%.

NT did not accept this submission and in the Response Document it is explained that currently, South Africa’s major trading partners in which the majority of CFCs are located are covered by the proposed comparable tax exemption of 67.5%. The Response Document further states that the comparable tax exemption will be assessed each financial year in order to determine its competitiveness and comparability, and if necessary legislative changes will be proposed based on such assessment.

Public benefit organisations

As stated in the Response Document, the Act currently affords SARS the discretion to retrospectively approve an organisation as a PBO in terms of s30(3B) of the Act. Once approved as a PBO, the receipts and accruals of such entity are exempt from income tax provided that certain conditions in s10 of the Act are met. In the Draft TLAB, it was proposed to delete s30(3B) and to remove obsolete transitional measures initially introduced to provide organisations that were exempt from the Act under the repealed legislation the opportunity to re-apply for exemption under s30 of the Act. Organisations were granted until December 2004 to re-apply for exemption under s30.

The Response Document indicates that one of the submissions NT received indicated that the deletion of s30(3B) will have adverse financial effects for such entities, as they have limited resources available which makes it difficult for them to deal with tax technical issues timeously.

According to the Response Document, NT noted this submission and explained that the granting of retrospective approval to PBOs that have been in existence for several years has the consequence that previously taxed receipts and accruals become exempt. This results in refunds having to be paid by SARS with interest, in some cases dating back to years that have already prescribed. NT indicated that as opposed to deleting s30(3B) of the Act, PBOs seeking retrospective approval as exempt entities shall be granted such approval if they meet certain requirements, and only at the discretion of SARS.

Next step

Pursuant to the publication of the Response Document and based on what is stated therein, NT will amend the Draft TLAB and Draft TLAB, following which the Minister will likely table these amended versions of the bills in Parliament on 30 October 2019.

download PDF

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter.

We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages.

Please refer to the full terms and conditions on the website.

Copyright © 2019 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com

You may also be interested in