Contact

Honesty is the best policy: Possible jail time for CV fraudsters

Back to top

Honesty is the best policy: Possible jail time for CV fraudsters

On 13 August 2019, the National Qualifications Framework Amendment Act, No 12 of 2019 (the Act) was signed into law. While the Act is not yet in effect, when it comes into effect, lying on a CV could result in prison time, a fine or both.

26 Aug 2019 1 min read Employment Alert Article

Section 32B(3) of the Act provides that “A person is guilty of an offence, if such person falsely or fraudulently claims to be holding a qualification or part-qualification registered on the NQF or awarded by an education institution, skills development provider, QC or obtained from a lawfully recognised foreign institution.”

In terms of s32B(6), any person convicted of an offence in terms of s32B(3) is liable to a fine or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding five years, or to both a fine and imprisonment.

The amendments mean that fraudulently misrepresenting one’s qualifications or part-qualifications can have very serious consequences, over and above the possibility of being dismissed for misrepresentation and/or dishonesty.

Having regard to the broad manner in which s32B(3) is drafted, the offence is not limited to misrepresentations on CVs alone. It can include, for example, fraudulent misrepresentations on social media platforms such as Facebook and LinkedIn.

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2024 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com.

You might also be interested in

15 May 2023

by Jose Jorge and Leila Moosa

The review test restated

In the recent judgment of Makuleni v Standard Bank of SA (Pty) Ltd and Others 44 ILJ 1005 (LAC), the Labour Appeal Court (LAC) reaffirmed the test for the review of a Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) arbitration award. Interestingly, the LAC was critical of the arbitrator for not allowing legal representation in arbitration proceedings that became protracted and seemingly chaotic.

Employment Law

5 min read

19 Jun 2023

Police intervention in violent strikes

Given the unfortunate reality that strikes can be characterised by violence, it is important to understand the role the police can be called upon to play in ensuring that violence and damage to persons and property is prevented, or where it has already taken place, does not continue.

Employment Law

4 min read

1 Feb 2024

by Gerhard Badenhorst

VAT agency and principals

The terms “ agent ” and “ agency ” are not defined in the Value Added Tax Act 89 of 1991 (VAT Act). The South African Revenue Service (SARS) has indicated in Interpretation Note 42 (IN 42) that it accepts that the common law relationship between the principal and the agent prescribes the value-added tax (VAT) consequences of this legal relationship. The general VAT rule is that where a person, acting as agent, supplies goods or services on behalf of a principal to a third party, the supply is deemed to be made by the principal and not the agent (section 54(1) of the VAT Act). Conversely, where a third-party supplier makes a supply to an agent acting on behalf of a principal, that supply is deemed to be made to the principal (section 54(2) of the VAT Act). In these instances, the principal and not the agent must account for VAT on the supplies.

Tax & Exchange Control

6 min read

15 May 2023

by Desmond Odhiambo and Kevin Kipchirchir

The concept of lockouts and how employers may respond to a strike

A lot of discourse within employment circles in Kenya has been about strikes. However, very little has been said about the right of employers to lockout employees.

Employment Law

19:21 Minutes

10 Aug 2023

by Nomlayo Mabhena-Mlilo

The test for insolvency revisited: Setting aside liquidation proceedings

In the case of The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service v Nyhonyha and Others (1150/2021) ZASCA 69 (18 May 2023) the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) was confronted with the question of whether the High Court erred in setting aside an order for the liquidation of Regiments Capital (Pty) Ltd (Regiments) in circumstances where the conditions that led to the order for liquidation had sincechanged. 

Business Rescue, Restructuring & Insolvency

7 min read

25 Apr 2023

by Brigitta Mangale and Elgene Roos

Women empowerment through impact litigation

This conversation forms part of the CDH Women in Law podcast series, where several members of our firm will discuss the importance of women's empowerment and highlight CDH's dedication to this cause. CDH's Pro Bono and Human Rights practice Director Brigitta Mangale and Senior Associate Elgene Roos join CDH Conversations to discuss the role of impact litigation in enforcing and protecting the rights of women in South Africa.

Pro Bono & Human Rights

16:51 Minutes

This website uses cookies to enhance the browsing experience. For more information, please see our Cookie Policy.

Accept Decline