Contact

Large scale retrenchments: Independent facilitators as opposed to CCMA appointed facilitators? You decide

Back to top

Large scale retrenchments: Independent facilitators as opposed to CCMA appointed facilitators? You decide

The purpose of s189A of the Labour Relations Act, No 66 of 1995 (LRA) is to regulate large scale retrenchments. In large scale retrenchments, an employer is obliged to consult with the appropriate consulting parties and engage in a meaningful joint consensus seeking process aimed at reaching agreement on a number of issues including measures to avoid, minimise and mitigate the adverse effects of the anticipated retrenchments, selection criteria and severance pay. This process seeks to enhance the effectiveness of consultation in large scale retrenchments by avoiding unnecessary disputes. Where facilitation is selected in accordance with s189A of the LRA, it follows that facilitation must take place at an early stage to ensure effective and fair process. 

9 Oct 2017 2 min read Employment Alert Article

The primary role of a facilitator is to manage the consultation process. The duty to consult rests primarily on the employer and not the facilitator. The facilitator has certain obligations which are contained in the Facilitation Regulations, (2002) (the Regulations) that have been issued by the Minister of Labour in terms of s189A(6) of the LRA. This includes an obligation to hold at least four facilitation meetings, unless consensus is reached at an earlier point in the process.

In the case of Edcon v Steenkamp and Others (2015) 36 ILJ 1469 (LAC), the Labour Appeal Court held that one of the key innovations introduced by s189A of the LRA is that the consultation process can be conducted by an independent facilitator. Although this case went as far as the Constitutional Court this particular point was not challenged.

Section 189A(3) of the LRA provides that the CCMA must appoint a facilitator to assist the parties in two instances, firstly if the employer has requested facilitation in its s189(3) notice or, secondly if the consulting parties representing the majority of the employees who the employer contemplates dismissing have requested facilitation and notified the CCMA accordingly within fifteen (15) days of the issuing the s189(3) notice. 

Section 189A(4) of the LRA allows the parties to agree to appoint an independent facilitator. In such cases, the facilitation should be conducted in terms of the Regulations.

The Edcon case recognised that the parties are not obliged to submit to facilitation and may opt not to do so. Facilitation will only be obligatory if the employer or the other consulting parties have requested it, or if there is an agreement to appoint a facilitator in terms of s189A(4) of the LRA.

The appointment of an independent facilitator has advantages, namely the parties can agree to the identity of the facilitator, who is a specialist in this field and would be best suited in the prevailing circumstances. The time frame for the consultation process can be expedited and becomes more flexible as there is no unnecessary delays or restrictions due the strain placed on the resources of the CCMA. It allows the parties to own the process and structure the timing of the facilitation meetings in order to achieve an expeditious and effective outcome. 

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2024 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com.

You might also be interested in

9 Oct 2023

What happens when there are no employee/employment contracts transferred? Is the business still transferred as a going concern?

The Labour Court recently had to decide whether the termination of a service agreement and the concluding of another service agreement with a new service provider to render the same or similar services constituted the transfer of a business as a going concern in terms of section 197 of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (LRA).

Employment Law

1 min read

28 Feb 2024

by Roux van der Merwe and Yaniv Kleitman

To survive, or not to survive? Some conditions precedent pitfalls to look out for

One of the important aspects of written agreements being subject to the fulfilment or waiver of certain agreed conditions precedent, or suspensive conditions, (CPs) before the substantive provisions of the agreement become of force and effect, is the so-called “ surviving provisions/clauses ” (also known as “ immediately effective provisions/clauses ”). In the ordinary course, the crux of the transaction contemplated in such an agreement and the clauses relating to it are suspended from the signature date until all of the CPs are fulfilled or waived (if permissible and applicable) by an agreed date or dates (fulfilment date). If all of the CPs are not fulfilled or waived by the fulfilment date, the agreement effectively falls away and will be of no force or effect. However, it should be borne in mind that the parties to an agreement with CPs may very well intend for certain of the clauses in the agreement to come into force and effect from the signature date of the agreement and to survive the falling away of the substantive provisions due to non-fulfilment of theCPs. 

Corporate & Commercial Law

6 min read

21 Sep 2023

by Adnaan Kariem

The borrowing powers of universities

In recent years, South African universities have increasingly been borrowing large sums of money to fund their major infrastructure projects or working capital requirements. In this article, the source of public higher educational institutions’ (referred to as universities) borrowing powers is discussed.

Finance & Banking Law

5 min read

9 Nov 2023

by Tendai Jangara

'Rethinking Whistleblowing in African Corporate Governance: Building Trust, Ethical Culture, and Effectiveness’.

Corporate & White Collar Investigations

18:26 Minutes

19 Jul 2023

by Desmond Odhiambo, Christine Mugenyu and Effie Atieno

Liquidation of Tuskys Supermarket: A case of too little too late

On 31 May 2023, Justice Majanja issued a judgment that marked an end to the restructuring efforts of Tuskys Supermarket after a three-year court battle. It was another classic example of an attempt to restructure a company’s debt at the tail end of a distress cycle rather than at the early stages when the chances of recovery are higher.

Business Rescue, Restructuring & Insolvency

3 min read

3 Jul 2023

The protection against self-help: Employers be aware

The Labour Appeal Court recently confirmed that an employer may not deduct or withhold any amount from an employee’s remuneration if the employee participated in an unlawful strike and the employer failed to implement the ‘no work no pay’ principle during the month in which the employee did not render services.

4 min read

This website uses cookies to enhance the browsing experience. For more information, please see our Cookie Policy.

Accept Decline