Contact

The transfer of retirement funds: Anomalies no more

Back to top

The transfer of retirement funds: Anomalies no more

In terms of paragraph 2(l) of the Seventh Schedule to the Income Tax Act No 58 of 1962, where an employer has made any contribution for the benefit of any employee to any pension fund, provident or retirement annuity fund, such contribution constitutes a fringe benefit in the hands of an employee. Such fringe benefit is included in the gross income of an employee. The amounts contributed by the employer forms part of a so-called employer reserve account and constitutes a post-tax amount as the fringe benefit has already been taxed. 

22 Feb 2018 1 min read Article

However, the Budget notes that currently, the transfer of fund amounts between, or within, retirement funds at the same employer has inadvertently led to a tax liability for members, due to the current wording of the legislation. In principle, there should be no additional tax consequence for members if the transfers refer to amounts that have already been contributed to the retirement fund. The Budget therefore proposes that legislative amendments will be retrospectively introduced to correct these unintended tax liabilities. This proposed amendment is likely to be welcomed by all persons who have contributed to a retirement fund, especially as it will likely apply retrospectively.

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2024 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com.

You might also be interested in

29 Sep 2023

by Brigitta Mangale

The decriminalisation of cannabis use and/or possession for minors: A significant shift in South African drug law reform

In 2019, the Constitutional Court in Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and Others v Prince and Others (1) SA 14 (CC), partially confirmed the judgment in Prince v Minister of Justice and Others (4) SA 299 (WCC), which declared provisions of the Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act 140 of 1992 (Drugs Act) and the Medicines and Related Substances Act 101 of 1965 unconstitutional. In doing so, the Constitutional Court decriminalised the use, possession and cultivation of cannabis by adults for their personal use in private.

Pro Bono & Human Rights

5 min read

8 Aug 2023

by Alex Kanyi

Finance Act 2023: Focus on the Housing Levy

The Finance Act 2023 came into force on 1 July 2023 despite efforts to suspend its implementation.

Tax & Exchange Control

1:58:53 Minutes

6 Jul 2023

by Mashudu Mphafudi and Michael Bailey

The application of the in duplum rule to post-judgment interest: The SCA clarifies the legal position

The in duplum rule will not come to your rescue if you fail to make post-judgment interest after arrear interest ceases to accrue when the unpaid arrear interest equals the principal debt while litigation is still pending. The Supreme Court of Appeal recently confirmed this in MEC: Police, Roads, and Transport Free State Provincial Government v Bovicon Consulting Engineers CC and Another (278/2022) ZASCA 99 (14 June 2023).

Finance & Banking Law

4 min read

14 Jun 2023

by Albert Aukema and Ruan Jacobs

Striking the balance: The correct approach to competing public interest considerations

The Competition Amendment Act 18 of 2018 (Amendment Act), was signed into law on 13 February 2019 by President Cyril Ramaphosa. It made several significant amendments to the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (Competition Act), one of which was the amendment of section 12A by the addition of a paragraph (e) in subsection (3). This paragraph directs the competition authorities, when considering whether a merger can or cannot be justified on public interest grounds, to consider the effect that the merger will have on “ the promotion of a greater spread of ownership, in particular to increase the levels of ownership by historically disadvantaged persons and workers in firms in the market ”.

Competition Law

4 min read

9 Jun 2023

by Jacquie Cassette and Elgene Roos

Traditional Khoi-San Leadership Act: The importance of meaningful public participation during the law-making process

“This case is about the significance of participatory democracy for millions of South Africans who for the most part live away from the centres of power, in rural areas and some of the poorest parts of our country.”

Pro Bono & Human Rights

7 min read

1 Sep 2023

by Brigitta Mangale

Developments in anti-bullying measures in South Africa: Possible jail time for bullies

South Africa is a country plagued by bullying and associated child-on-child abuse. Despite there being five separate pieces of legislation aimed at preventing and addressing bullying among minors in and outside of school, educational institutions, parents, and teachers are still struggling to grapple with the complex nature of bullying. Over the past few months, our country has had a notable increase in minor student suicides, which have been heavily reported to be a consequence of bullying.

5 min read

This website uses cookies to enhance the browsing experience. For more information, please see our Cookie Policy.

Accept Decline