Contact

Fruitless and wasteful expenditure: Tax deductible no more?

Back to top

Fruitless and wasteful expenditure: Tax deductible no more?

In the lead up to the Budget, the opinion was widely expressed that if the extent of fruitless and wasteful expenditure in the public sector were addressed, it could go a long way in correcting our country’s budget shortfall. 

22 Feb 2018 1 min read Article

An interesting issue raised in the Budget is that Treasury will consider the tax implications arising from fruitless and wasteful expenditure. To ensure proper governance of public entities and encourage accountability, government proposes that losses or expenditure classified as fruitless and wasteful will not qualify for a tax deduction. What remains to be seen is exactly how fruitless and wasteful expenditure will be defined for tax purposes, as no such definition currently exists in the Income Tax Act, No 58 of 1962. 

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2025 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com.

You might also be interested in

15 Jan 2025

by Alex Muchira and Yvonne Mkefa

Filing of financial statements

Section 683 of the Companies Act, 2015, read together with sections 686, 687, 688 and 689 of the Companies Act, requires companies to lodge financial statements for each financial year with the Registrar of Companies(Registrar). 

Corporate & Commercial Law

5 min read

31 Mar 2025

Implementation of court online electronic platform in the Labour Court

The first Directive of the Labour Court has been issued. In terms of this directive, the Court Online Portal will be fully implemented for all aspects of cases initiated in the Labour Court with effect from 14 April 2025. The decision to implement the Court Online Portal is the culmination of the phased approach adopted where, first, the platform was only used for urgent applications and, thereafter, broadened to include all applications. From 14 April, however, the Portal will be implemented for all aspects of cases initiated in the Labour Court

Employment Law

1 min read

16 Jan 2025

by Yaniv Kleitman and Roxanne Bain

Webinar Recording | Unpacking the Companies Act amendments

Our legal experts provided valuable insights into the key Companies Act amendments in a thought-provoking webinar.

Corporate & Commercial Law

54:03 Minutes

4 Feb 2025

by Belinda Scriba and Claudia Grobler

Navigating change: The new Expropriation Act v the old Expropriation Act

The Expropriation Bill of 2020, as approved and signed by the President, was published on 24 January 2025. It is now formally known as the Expropriation Act 13 of 2024 (New Act). The date from which the New Act comes into operation is yet to be determined by the President, and will be confirmed by proclamation in the Government Gazette . The Expropriation Act 63 of 1975 (Old Act), which until now was the primary legislative authority governing expropriation of land, has been repealed with the enactment of the NewAct.  

Agriculture, Aquaculture & Fishing

2 min read

21 Feb 2025

by Jacquie Cassette and Elgene Roos

Unlocking citizenship: Overcoming irregular birth certificates

Nearly a decade after the coming into effect of various amendments to the South African Citizenship Act 88 of 1995 (Citizenship Act), which included a new ground of citizenship through the insertion of section 4(3) the Department of Home Affairs (Department) continues to impose arbitrary requirements that create unnecessary barriers to deserving applicants seeking to enforce their right to citizenship under section 4(3) of the act. This pattern of deprivation not only violates the clear provisions set forth in the Citizenship Act, but also effectively undermines the rule of law by denying individuals their legitimate rights entrenched in our Constitution, 1996. It raises serious concerns about the integrity and fairness of the implementation of the legal framework governing citizenship.

Pro Bono & Human Rights

7 min read

6 Nov 2024

by Yaniv Kleitman, Marelise van der Westhuizen and Roxanne Bain

Making sense of beneficial ownership thresholds: The FIC Act versus the Companies Act

Both the Financial Intelligence Centre Act 38 of 2001 (FIC Act) and the Companies Act 71 of 2008 (Companies Act) create legal regimes relating to the uncovering of beneficial ownership of an entity. The former requires accountable institutions (as defined) to verify the beneficial owners of their clients, and the latter requires certain types of companies (namely, non-affected companies 1 ) to keep record of and disclose their beneficial owners to the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC).

Corporate & Commercial Law

6 min read

This website uses cookies to enhance the browsing experience. For more information, please see our Cookie Policy.

Accept Decline