Contact

Aadil Patel joined SAfm to discuss sexual harassment in the workplace.

Back to top

Aadil Patel joined SAfm to discuss sexual harassment in the workplace.

Director & National Employment Head, Aadil Patel joined a recent SAfm discussion to deliberate sexual harassment in the workplace

16 Nov 2018 Podcast
Aadil Patel joined SAfm to discuss sexual harassment in the workplace.

Aadil Patel joined SAfm to discuss sexual harassment in the workplace.

Podcast

Aadil Patel joined SAfm to discuss sexual harassment in the workplace.

Podcast

00:00 00:00
Download MP3

Director & National Employment Head, Aadil Patel joined a recent SAfm discussion to deliberate sexual harassment in the workplace

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2023 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com.

You might also be interested in

23 Aug 2023

by Shameegh Allen and David Thompson

Minority protections against oppressive and/or prejudicial amendments to an MOI

When considering the age-old question of which provisions should be contained in the memorandum of incorporation (MOI) and which provisions should be contained in the shareholders’ agreement (SHA), one important consideration which is often overlooked is the threshold required to amend an MOI as opposed to an SHA.

Corporate & Commercial Law

6 min read

8 Mar 2023

by Lucinde Rhoodie, Muwanwa Ramanyimi and Claudia Grobler

So close, yet so far: The effect of liquidation on judicially attached property

So, you have your court order, writ of execution and have judicially attached the movable assets of your debtor, and you are only one step away from finally recovering what you are owed; what could possibly go wrong? We have all been warned never to ask that question, because, like in the movies, that is when it all seems to start going wrong. It often happens that default judgment is obtained; a writ of execution is issued and the sheriff judicially attaches the debtor’s movable assets and draws up the inventory. However, before the sheriff can remove the assets for a sale in execution, another creditor brings a liquidation application against the same debtor and a provisional liquidation order is granted.

Business Rescue, Restructuring & Insolvency

5 min read

21 Jun 2023

by Luke Kleinsmidt, Jenny Harwin, Dane Kruger and Peter Hesseling

Director removals: Is there any reason to give reasons?

Navigating the inconsistencies in the manner in which our courts and regulators apply the law regarding director removals at the instance of the shareholders.

Corporate & Commercial Law

7 min read

10 Aug 2023

by Jerome Brink

New proposed draft legislation published by SARS and National Treasury for public comment

After taxpayers waited patiently, National Treasury and the South African Revenue Service (SARS) published the 2023 Draft Tax Bills and Regulations on 31 July 2023. In particular, the 2023 draft Taxation Laws Amendment Bill (draft TLAB) and the 2023 draft Tax Administration Laws Amendment Bill (draft TALAB) have been published.

Tax & Exchange Control

6 min read

29 Sep 2023

by Gretchen Barkhuizen-Barbosa and Emily West

Exploring the Trusts & Estates Practice

Director and Head of the Trusts & Estates Practice Gretchen Barkhuizen-Barbosa, together with Senior Associate Emily West on CDH Conversations podcast.

Trusts & Estates Law

09:48 Minutes

23 Oct 2023

by Jean Ewang and Thato Makoaba

Automatically unfair dismissal for refusing to take the COVID-19 vaccine? The Labour Court’s first decision

The law regarding automatically unfair dismissals is trite and has been tested by our courts on various occasions. Recently, however, in the case of Burton Maasdorp v University of Free State JS647/2022 , the Labour Court handed down the first decision regarding an automatically unfair dismissal claim resulting from an employee’s refusal to adhere to a workplace COVID-19 vaccination policy. 

Employment Law

3 min read

This website uses cookies to enhance the browsing experience. For more information, please see our Cookie Policy.

Accept Decline