Contact

SARS and Spur legal battle

Back to top

SARS and Spur legal battle

Recently, the South African Revenue Service (SARS) and Spur have been at loggerheads regarding the restaurant group's R48 million share scheme incentive. Jerome Brink, Director in our Tax & Exchange Control Practice provided insight, from a legal perspective, on The Money Show with Bruce Whitfield

22 Oct 2021 10:42 Minutes Radio interview
SARS and Spur legal battle

SARS and Spur legal battle

Podcast

SARS and Spur legal battle

Podcast

00:00 00:00
Download MP3

Recently, the South African Revenue Service (SARS) and Spur have been at loggerheads regarding the restaurant group's R48 million share scheme incentive. Jerome Brink, Director in our Tax & Exchange Control Practice provided insight, from a legal perspective, on The Money Show with Bruce Whitfield

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2025 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com.

You might also be interested in

27 May 2024

Misconduct confessions: When are they voluntary and admissible?

In the case of Brauns and Others v Wilkes N.O and Others 4 BLLR 365 (LAC), the three appellants sought to appeal the Labour Court judgment which dismissed their application to review an arbitration award which had found that their dismissal for dishonesty was substantivelyfair. 

4 min read

17 Sep 2024

by Lutfiyya Kara

Lutfiyya Kara, Senior Associate in the Real Estate Law practice discussed the Hardest part of a transaction

Lutfiyya Kara, Senior Associate in the Real Estate practice was featured in the DealMakers Women 2024 Issue where she discussed the Hardest part of a transaction .

Real Estate Law

1 min read

26 Mar 2025

by Alex de Wet, Everton Muberekwa and Claudia Grobler

Following on our article regarding the Department of Health’s recent ban on cannabis- and hemp-infused food products

Following on our article regarding the Department of Health’s recent ban on cannabis- and hemp-infused food products, as published earlier today, President Cyril Ramaphosa has now intervened to withdraw the ban following widespreadbacklash. 

Agriculture, Aquaculture & Fishing

1 min read

28 Jan 2025

by Kgodisho Phashe

Not factoring mental health into health and safety protocols could land employers in legal hot water

Kgodisho Phashe, a Senior Associate in the Employment Law practice, joined Bridget Masina on SAfm to discuss the topic, "Not factoring mental health into health and safety protocols could land employers in legal hot water."

Employment Law

10:48 Minutes

31 Mar 2025

by Taryn York and Mapaseka Nketu

Foreigners with pending waiver applications, visa applications and visa appeal applications safeguarded against adverse consequences until 30 September 2025

To the much-anticipated relief of many foreign nationals, on 28 March 2025, the Minister of Home Affairs, Dr Leon Schreiber extended the previous temporary blanket extension that expires today, 31 March 2025. The purpose of the latest extension is to address the visa, waiver and appeal outcomes that will not be ready for collection prior to the 31 March 2025 deadline due to amongst other things delays in the printing process. In addition, the extension would allow the Department of Home Affairs (DHA) an opportunity to focus on appeal outcomes, resultant from rejected visa applications.

Employment Law

2 min read

24 Jun 2024

by Imraan Mahomed and Nadeem Mahomed

Update: Union representation in litigation disputes

Over the years, the question of whether an aggrieved employee may be represented in litigation proceedings by any trade union has been the subject of some uncertainty. That was until 2022, when the question was considered by the Labour Appeal Court (LAC) in NUMSA & Others v Afgri Animal Feeds (Ltd) (2022) 43 ILJ 1998 (LAC) where the LAC found that employees have the right to be represented by a trade union of their choice in litigation proceedings, regardless of whether the trade union’s constitution covers the industry in which the employees are employed. However, for collective bargaining rights, a trade union cannot bargain collectively with the employer in an industry outside of its scope (as the court saw this as a separate issue). To read our 2022 alert about this matter, click here [/en/news/publications/2022/Practice/Employment/employment-law-alert-29-august-union-representation-in-litigation-disputes.html#:~:text=With reference to Lufil Packaging,of union representation is unfettered.] .

Employment Law

2 min read

This website uses cookies to enhance the browsing experience. For more information, please see our Cookie Policy.

Accept Decline