Contact

Smile FM - Constitutional Court - Landmark Clicks case with SARS

Back to top

Smile FM - Constitutional Court - Landmark Clicks case with SARS

Jerome Brink, Director in the Tax and Exchange Control practice joined Smile FM, to discuss the landmark Constitutional Court ruling of an appeal by Clicks Retailers against a refusal by SARS to approve an allowance claimed by Clicks in terms of section 24C of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962.

13 Jun 2021 Radio interview
Smile FM - Constitutional Court - Landmark Clicks case with SARS

Smile FM - Constitutional Court - Landmark Clicks case with SARS

Podcast

Smile FM - Constitutional Court - Landmark Clicks case with SARS

Podcast

00:00 00:00
Download MP3

Jerome Brink, Director in the Tax and Exchange Control practice joined Smile FM, to discuss the landmark Constitutional Court ruling of an appeal by Clicks Retailers against a refusal by SARS to approve an allowance claimed by Clicks in terms of section 24C of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962.

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2024 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com.

You might also be interested in

20 Jun 2023

Can business rescue assist in avoiding the illusion of false optimism

Tobie Jordaan, Head of our Business Rescue, Restructuring & Insolvency sector was on Michael Avery's show on Fine Music Radio.

Business Rescue, Restructuring & Insolvency

08:08 Minutes

26 Sep 2023

by Ceciley Oates

Antenuptial contracts: I do/I don’t

In terms of the Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984 (Matrimonial Property Act), all marriages and civil unions entered into between parties are at present automatically deemed as being in community of property. In terms of this matrimonial property regime, the parties’ assets are pooled together to form one joint (communal) estate. The parties therefore become the owners of an undivided one-half share in and to each other’s respective estate, which is inclusive of all their assets and liabilities (debts).

Real Estate Law

9 min read

10 Jul 2023

by Imraan Mahomed and Thato Makoaba

Cannabis in the workplace: Clearing the air

In 2018 the Constitutional Court handed down the landmark judgment of Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and Others v Prince (6) SA 393 (CC), which legalised the private use and possession of cannabis. Concerns about the effect of the judgment in the workplace were ameliorated with an interpretation of the law, mostly in arbitration awards, which found that employers remain empowered to set workplace policies regulating substance abuse, including the use of cannabis. This position was recently confirmed in the 27 June 2023 Labour Court judgment of Marasi v Petroleum Oil and Gas Corporation of South Africa (C219/2020) ZALCCT 34.

Employment Law

3 min read

3 Jul 2023

by Aadil Patel, Hugo Pienaar, Nadeem Mahomed and Keanen Naidoo

Are the establishment of picketing rules a requirement for lawful strike action

On 21 April 2023, the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) published amended Rules for the Conduct of Proceedings Before the CCMA (Rules). One of these amended rules relates to the establishment of picketing rules prior to the issuing of a certificate of non-resolution in disputes relating to the right to strike.

3 min read

25 Apr 2024

by Thandiwe Nhlapho

No blissful ignorance for non-compliance: The Turquand rule and section 20(7) in the context of special resolutions and fundamental transactions

The Turquand rule has been discussed and fairly applied in the South African jurisprudence. However, an interesting question remains as to whether the Turquand rule or section 20(7) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 (Companies Act) can be used to compel a party to implement a transaction where the party has not complied with the applicable provisions of the Companies Act requiring a special resolution of shareholders for the disposal of all or a greater part of the company’s assets or undertaking, amalgamation or merger, or a scheme of arrangement (fundamental transactions). The jurisprudence has adopted the take-no-prisoners approach sofar. 

Corporate & Commercial Law

4 min read

22 Apr 2024

by Mongezi Mpahlwa

We need business rescue to combat extreme rise in liquidations

Mongezi Mpahlwa, Director of our Dispute Resolution practice joined Tumisang Ndlovu on Newzroom Afrika to discuss the need for business rescue to combat the extreme rise in liquidations.

Business Rescue, Restructuring & Insolvency

09:40 Minutes

This website uses cookies to enhance the browsing experience. For more information, please see our Cookie Policy.

Accept Decline