
A prudent question is one-half of wisdom: The consequences of business email compromise for banks and attorneys
It was Sun Tzu who famously said, "He who is prudent and lies in wait for an enemy who is not, will be victorious." However, what happens to an attorney who is sufficiently prudent to confirm the banking details of a recipient but fails to question a change in the previously provided banking details of the same recipient and then falls prey to fraudsters? This question was answered by the full bench of the High Court in the case of Hartog v Daly and Others (A5012/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 40; [2023] 2 All SA 156 (GJ) (24 January 2023).