Our team represented a leading US-based global professional services network
Our team represented a leading US-based global professional services network
We represented a leading US-based global professional services network in a cluster of related actions where so-called investors, who had invested their monies in a Ponzi scheme, sought an indemnity from our client should they not recover their money from the fraudster's estate.
You might also be interested in
4 Feb 2025
by Michelle Kibui
The Supreme Court’s judgment in Kwanza Estates Limited v Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology
Before delving into the specifics of the Supreme Court’s decision in Kwanza Estates Limited v Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (Petition E001 of 2024), it is helpful to first establish some key principles that underpin the governance of leases.
Real Estate Law & Conveyancing
10 min read
5 May 2025
by Alex Kanyi, Denis Maina, Nicholas Owino and Ian Ounoi
Unpacking the Kenya Finance Bill 2025: What's changing?
Kenya's Finance Bill, 2025 (Bill) came out on Wednesday 30 April2025.
Tax & Exchange Control
33 min read
27 May 2025
by Clive Rumsey, Kananelo Sikhakhane and Iva Babayi
Courts are unlikely to grant relief where hardship results from a party’s own inaction
In this alert, we look at the Supreme Court of Appeal’s (SCA) decision in Kidrogen RF (Pty) Ltd v Erasmus and Others, which reminds us that the courts are unlikely to grant relief where hardship results from a party’s own inaction or failure to comply with agreedtimelines.
Dispute Resolution
4 min read
31 Jul 2025
by Sammy Ndolo, Stella Situma, Damaris Muia and Nicholas Owino
Court’s approach to balancing contractual freedom with protection against unconscionable contract terms
In a recent landmark decision, Kanwal Sarjit Singh Dhiman v Kenshvaji Jivraj Shah eKLR, the Court of Appeal (Court) addressed, among other things, the enforceability of contracts containing exploitative interest provisions. The Court declared the contract in question void on the grounds that its enforcement would result in oppressive and unconscionable consequences.
Banking, Finance & Projects
4 min read
24 Mar 2025
by Yvonne Mkefa, Kgodisho Phashe and Goitsemodimo Litheko
Workplace disputes and legal parameters in relation to defamation, contractual interference, and repudiation
In Sephton v Anglo Operations Pty Ltd (A2024/113960) ZAGPJHC 239, the High Court considered several key factors in its judgment. The appeal was brought against a prior ruling that granted absolution from the instance for the primary and alternative claims against the first, second, and third respondents while dismissing defamation and contractual interference claims. The court focused on whether the appellant had established a legal basis for defamation, wrongful interference with a contract, and repudiation. It examined the facts surrounding an alleged workplace harassment incident, the investigation that followed, and the contractual implications of the appellant’s exclusion from the site.
Employment Law
4 min read
24 Feb 2025
by Imraan Mahomed and Thobeka Kalipa
Workplace harassment
One may be forgiven for thinking that this has become a worn-out topic with so much written and spoken about the subject since the #MeToo movement began. The topic was reignited in South Africa around March 2022 when the Code of Good Practice on the Prevention and Elimination of Harassment in the Workplace (Code) came into effect, and the subject remains relevant.
6 min read