Katekani Mashamba
Katekani Mashamba is a Senior Associate in our Dispute Resolution practice.
About Katekani
About Katekani
Katekani is an accomplished commercial litigation attorney with a proven track record litigating cases in various courts, including the High Court, Supreme Court of Appeal, and the Constitutional Court. She specialises in commercial litigation, and her focus is on areas such as the Companies Act, insolvency, business rescue, as well as general civil litigation, public, and administrative law. In addition, Katekani is well-versed in alternative dispute resolution methods, offering clients effective solutions outside the traditional courtroom setting.
She joined CDH as an Associate in 2022 and was promoted to Senior Associate in 2024.
Credentials
Credentials
Education
-
Bachelor of Laws – UNISA
- Year of admission as an attorney: 2019
- Registered with the Legal Practice Council
Membership
- Member of the South African Restructuring & Insolvency Practitioners Association (SARIPA)
Languages
Languages
- English
- isiZulu
- Sesotho
- Xitsonga
About Katekani
Katekani is an accomplished commercial litigation attorney with a proven track record litigating cases in various courts, including the High Court, Supreme Court of Appeal, and the Constitutional Court. She specialises in commercial litigation, and her focus is on areas such as the Companies Act, insolvency, business rescue, as well as general civil litigation, public, and administrative law. In addition, Katekani is well-versed in alternative dispute resolution methods, offering clients effective solutions outside the traditional courtroom setting.
She joined CDH as an Associate in 2022 and was promoted to Senior Associate in 2024.
Credentials
Education
-
Bachelor of Laws – UNISA
- Year of admission as an attorney: 2019
- Registered with the Legal Practice Council
Membership
- Member of the South African Restructuring & Insolvency Practitioners Association (SARIPA)
Languages
- English
- isiZulu
- Sesotho
- Xitsonga
News
Unilateral decisions by business rescue practitioners: A make or break in the termination of business rescue proceedings
Monyela N.O and Others v Tayob N.O and Others (2023/117272) ZAGPPHC 86 (2 February 2024 ) involved an application for leave to appeal a judgment granted in theurgentcourt.
Non-compliance with court orders: When is late too late?
In Economic Freedom Fighters and Others v The Chairperson of The Powers and Privileges Committee N.O and Others (23230/2023) Zawchc 16 (30 January 2024) the court had to determine...
Trusts and suretyship: Is consent from a majority of trustees enough for a trust to conclude an agreement?
In the decision of Shepstone & Wylie Attorneys v Abraham Johannes de Witt N O and Others (1270/2021) ZASCA, the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) had to determine whether the court a quo...
Orthogonal tactics to try save a sinking ship
People rarely abandon a ship unless they have absolutely no alternative. The same can be said of some affected parties even when it is clear that the business rescue process has failed....
Market recognition
Won Pro-Bono Award 2020 – Refugee Law
Market recognition
Won Pro-Bono Award 2020 – Refugee Law