Further extension of Financial Provisioning Regulations' compliance deadline still leaves industry in the dark
At a glance
- The Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and Environment has proposed a 12-month extension to the compliance deadline for the 2015 Financial Provisioning (FP) Regulations in the mining industry.
- The 2015 FP Regulations were initially criticized for their potential to harm the mining industry, but subsequent proposed regulations aimed to address these concerns.
- The continuous extensions and uncertainties surrounding the regulations have left the industry in a state of uncertainty, with no clear indication of when a final regulatory overhaul will be implemented.
When the 2015 FP Regulations were first enacted on 20 November 2015, they were severely criticised for their potential to cripple the mining industry. The 2015 FP Regulations require a substantial increase in financial provision needed for rehabilitation under the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002, as they are far more onerous and require financial provision to be provided for annual concurrent rehabilitation and, more significantly, the remediation of latent or residual environmental impacts which may become known in the future. Owing to this and various regulatory ambiguities and contradictions across the 2015 FP Regulations, the initial deadline for compliance for existing rights holders was extended from February 2017 to February 2019.
Following two years of regulatory uncertainty, an overhaul of the financial provision regime was proposed with publication of the Proposed Regulations pertaining to the Financial Provision for Prospecting, Exploration, Mining or Production Operations (2017 Proposed FP Regulations) on 10 November 2017. Whilst still riddled with some uncertainties, the 2017 Proposed FP Regulations did appear to have considered the criticism levelled against the 2015 FP Regulations.
Despite their promulgation being considered a matter of priority, a final set of the 2017 Proposed FP Regulations was never published. Instead, in September 2018, industry was given a further extension until February 2020 to comply with the 2015 FP Regulations.
Following this, a further set of draft regulations – the Proposed Regulations pertaining to Financial Provisioning for the Rehabilitation and Remediation of Environmental Damage caused by Reconnaissance, Prospecting, Exploration, Mining or Production Operations (2019 Proposed FP Regulations) - was published in May 2019. The 2019 Proposed FP Regulations would have required industry to again acquaint themselves with further proposed changes to the financial provision regime, however, these proposed regulations did not cater for an extension of the February 2020 deadline. At a workshop held with the then Department of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries in June 2019 regarding the 2019 Proposed FP Regulations, it was made clear that no further extensions would be considered or provided.
In January 2020, just over a month before the February 2020 deadline, the Minister again amended the 2015 FP Regulations to introduce a further extension for compliance to June 2021. Following this, industry was faced with having to deal with the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, which took priority over the dialogue surrounding financial provision.
Given the various moving parts and ever moving compliance deadline, the above regulatory development is summarised in the infographic below:
As the June 2021 deadline drew closer, questions regarding the way forward began to emerge. With the 2015 FP Regulations ultimately still being in effect and almost two years having lapsed since the circulation of the 2019 Proposed FP Regulations for comment, industry was, despite indications of a further extension, still left in a position of having to prepare for complying with challenging (albeit necessary) regulations. As most anticipated, the Proposed Extension was published for comment, proposing to push the compliance deadline to June 2022.
Taking into account what has been nothing short of a regulatory rollercoaster ride, with industry continuously having to prepare for the rigour of the 2015 FP Regulations, the breathing space offered by the extensions does not provide the comfort or certainty required by industry. Moreover, with comments being due by 22 May 2021, the Proposed Extension is anticipated to take effect less than a month before the expiry of the current deadline of 19 June 2021. More timeous notice of the Proposed Extension could have assisted in not only providing some certainty, but also avoiding the incurrence of costs in preparing for regulatory changes that will in all likelihood eventually be revised.
Ultimately, the use of the extensions as a last-minute mechanism to provide some “relief” continues to leave industry in the dark, with the no indication on the timeframes for finalisation of a much-needed regulatory overhaul that has been on the cards since November 2017.
The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2024 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com.
Subscribe
We support our clients’ strategic and operational needs by offering innovative, integrated and high quality thought leadership. To stay up to date on the latest legal developments that may potentially impact your business, subscribe to our alerts, seminar and webinar invitations.
Subscribe