Contact

Updated: An Employers Guide to the Eased Level 3 Regulations

Back to top

Updated: An Employers Guide to the Eased Level 3 Regulations

On 1 February 2021, the President addressed the nation on the status of the ongoing COVID-19 global pandemic. With the decrease in the rate of infections and the arrival of 1 million doses of the Covishield vaccine on 1 February 2021, the President announced eased Alert Level 3 restrictions (AL3), with effect from 1 February 2021.

8 Feb 2021 1 min read Employment Law Alert Article

At a glance

  • The President announced eased Alert Level 3 restrictions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, allowing employees to work outside their homes with compliance to health protocols and social distancing.
  • Employers are encouraged to implement a phased-in approach and ensure COVID-19 readiness in the workplace.
  • Employers are not legally obligated to pay employees who self-quarantine after returning from a hotspot area, but options include working from home (full salary), using annual leave, or unpaid leave. Employers should communicate this requirement and may argue it does not amount to unfair discrimination.

The purpose of this guide is to assist employers in complying with their obligations in terms of the eased AL3 regulations, including other general advice in relation to the workplace in 2021.

Click here top download the Guide.

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2024 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com.

You might also be interested in

26 Sep 2024

by Natasha Fletcher

Natasha Fletcher, was featured in the DealMakers Women 2024 Issue where she discussed her career path

Natasha Fletcher, Counsel in the Real Estate practice was featured in the DealMakers Women 2024 Issue where she discussed her career path.

Real Estate Law

1 min read

13 Jun 2024

by Claudia Grobler

Evolving cannabis and hemp cultivation laws that present a significant opportunity for South Africa’s Agri sector

Claudia Grobler, Associate Designate in the Dispute Resolution practice joined Stephen Grootes on Newzroom Afrika to discuss the Evolving cannabis and hemp cultivation laws that present a significant opportunity for South Africa’s Agri sector.

Dispute Resolution

05:00 Minutes

29 Jul 2024

by Anli Bezuidenhout and Thato Maruapula

The dangers of social media use in the workplace

Advancements in technological gadgets such as smart phones and laptops, as well as the recent breakthroughs made in artificial intelligence, have undoubtedly made our lives easier by enabling us to access information seemingly at the speed oflight. 

Employment Law

06:58 Minutes

6 Aug 2024

by Katekani Mashamba and Marelise van der Westhuizen

Balancing transparency and process: A court's approach to dual application of PAIA and PAJA

In the case of SKG Africa (Pty) Ltd v the South African Local Government Association and Others (3) SA 540, the Eastern Cape High Court dealt with the challenges caused by the simultaneous application of two key pieces of legislation: the Promotion of Access to Information Act 2 of 2000 (PAIA) and the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 (PAJA).

Dispute Resolution

5 min read

15 Aug 2024

by Alistair Young, Alecia Pienaar and Anneri Du Preez

Small town Regional Court ruling has big-time environmental liability consequences for a company director

The long-standing yet seldomly relied upon director liability provision – section 34(7) in the National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998 (NEMA) – finally bared its substantial teeth in a court order that was handed down by Magistrate RM Nkuna on 21 September 2023 in the Phalaborwa Regional Court against Southern Sky Hotel and Leisure (Pty) Ltd (Southern Sky), the previous owner of the Hans Merensky Hotel, Golf and Spa and its sole director, Shamira Rinderknecht (Rinderknecht).

Environmental Law

5 min read

6 Nov 2024

by Yaniv Kleitman, Marelise van der Westhuizen and Roxanne Bain

Making sense of beneficial ownership thresholds: The FIC Act versus the Companies Act

Both the Financial Intelligence Centre Act 38 of 2001 (FIC Act) and the Companies Act 71 of 2008 (Companies Act) create legal regimes relating to the uncovering of beneficial ownership of an entity. The former requires accountable institutions (as defined) to verify the beneficial owners of their clients, and the latter requires certain types of companies (namely, non-affected companies 1 ) to keep record of and disclose their beneficial owners to the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC).

Corporate & Commercial Law

6 min read

This website uses cookies to enhance the browsing experience. For more information, please see our Cookie Policy.

Accept Decline