Take-private transaction roadmap: Getting your delisting transaction off the ground and across the line

Today’s market is primed for take-private transactions. Private equity funds and similar investment houses are sitting on committed funds they’ve been reluctant to deploy in uncertain market conditions during recent times and many JSE-listed companies (primarily the small- and medium-cap companies) are trading at enticing price points relative to their intrinsic value.

10 Nov 2021 10 min read Corporate & Commercial alert Article

At a glance

  • The current market conditions present favorable opportunities for take-private transactions, with private equity funds and investment houses having available funds and JSE-listed companies trading at attractive prices relative to their intrinsic value.
  • Small- and medium-cap companies listed on the JSE face difficulties in raising equity while bearing the costs and regulatory limitations associated with being listed, hindering their ability to capitalize on opportunities or navigate challenging operating environments.
  • Initiating a take-private transaction involves engaging key shareholders, submitting an expression of interest letter, carefully managing transaction-related announcements, and choosing between transaction structures such as a scheme of arrangement or a general offer. Pre-requisites, including confirmation of funds and fulfillment of non-subjective conditions, must be met before making a firm offer.

In addition, small- and medium-cap companies that listed on the JSE with the promise of ready access to capital are finding it difficult to raise equity in the current market but remain saddled with the additional costs associated with being listed on the JSE, as well as having their ability to nimbly capitalise on new opportunities or respond to difficult operating environments curtailed by the regulatory limitations imposed on JSE-listed companies.

This is a roadmap for initiating a take-private transaction. While we frame our discussion from the perspective of a third-party offeror (offeror) seeking to take private a JSE-listed target company (target), much of the analysis is equally applicable to public-to-private transactions undertaken by the JSE-listed company itself.

Initiating the transaction: Initial engagement and mitigating execution risk

Engagement with key shareholders

Engagement with shareholders of a regulated target in relation to a potential takeover is commonly referred to as “wall-crossing” as these shareholders are brought into the fold in relation to (typically) non-public information in respect of the potential transaction.

An offeror typically engages with key shareholders early in the process in order to (i) get a sense of potential support for the transaction before investing unnecessary time and money; (ii) obtain commitments in the form of irrevocable undertakings or letters of support to vote in favour of the transaction or accept the offer; and (iii) assist in convincing the target’s board that the potential transaction is one that merits being proposed to the target’s shareholders for consideration.

When approaching shareholders prior to the release of the firm intention announcement in respect of a potential transaction, the offeror should comply with the guideline published by the Takeover Regulation Panel (TRP) in terms of which an offeror may approach no more than five shareholders, each holding not less than 5% of the shares (see TRP Guideline 1/2013). However, application can be made to the TRP for a dispensation approving approaches to further shareholders.

Institutional shareholders or asset managers typically agree to being wall-crossed only if the offeror commits to the potential transaction being publicly announced or abandoned within a limited period of time. The reason for this is that such shareholder may, once wall-crossed, constitute an “insider” and thereby be prohibited from dealing in the target’s securities in terms of the insider trading rules of the Financial Markets Act 19 of 2012.

It is often possible to structure the engagement with these shareholders without agreeing to such a condition by carefully managing the timing of shareholder engagement and the information sharing process to ensure that the shareholder is not appraised of any inside information until sufficient deal certainty has been secured.

Expression of interest letter

It is often useful for an expression of interest letter (sometimes referred to as a “non-binding offer”) (EOI) to be submitted to the target for consideration and, if appropriate, signature. An EOI typically registers the offeror’s interest in pursuing the potential transaction and contains information in relation to the offeror, the source of the offeror’s transaction funding, the potential transaction structure and, possibly, an indicative offer price or price-range.

When crafting the terms of the EOI, in order to avoid contravening the Takeover Regulations or unwittingly triggering an announcement obligation, particular care should be given to ensuring that certain provisions of the EOI are expressly denoted as “non-binding” provisions.

The EOI may contain certain binding terms. These would typically include provisions regulating the diligence process, exclusivity arrangements, confidentiality, announcements and break fees (as applicable).

Transaction-related announcements

From an offeror’s perspective, it is usually preferrable to delay the release of announcements in relation to the potential transaction until as late as possible before the firm intention announcement is released. An announcement may signal to the market that the target is “in play”, thereby increasing the risk that an interloper may see an opportunity to muscle in on the transaction. In addition, the target has an obligation of equal disclosure in terms of which any information that it has shared with the offeror must also be shared with any other bona fide third-party offerors (or potential offerors) upon request, irrespective of whether the approach by that third-party is welcomed by the target board (see regulation 92 of the Takeover Regulations).

However, the target has a general obligation of disclosure to release a “cautionary announcement” without delay after it becomes aware of any of price sensitive information in relation to its securities (see para 3.4(a) of the JSE Listings Requirements). However, the JSE Listings Requirements allow that, provided that the information can be kept confidential, the target is entitled to refrain from publishing the announcement for a limited time period.

A conservative target board may be inclined to publish a cautionary announcement earlier rather than later, potentially introducing additional transaction execution risk. In this regard, the following should be considered:

  • the general disclosure obligation relates only to “price sensitive information”, which is information that is (i) specific or precise; and (ii) would, if published, materially affect the price of the target’s securities. During early engagement in relation to a potential transaction, the former criterion may not be present, making the release of a cautionary announcement premature, but this must be assessed on a case-by-case basis, having regard to the specific circumstances;
  • the JSE has issued guidance requesting that issuers release cautionary announcements only when technically required and not prematurely. Similarly, the TRP has warned against regulated companies trading under cautionary for protracted periods of time; and
  • the target is entitled, under the JSE Listings Requirements, to refrain from releasing a cautionary announcement for a limited period of time when confidentiality of the price sensitive information can be maintained. To mitigate risk, template “leak” cautionary announcements assuming different factual circumstances may be prepared in advance to enable the target to release the announcement without delay following indications of a leak of information in relation to the potential transaction.

The content of a cautionary announcement to be released is also a common pressure point. The JSE prefers detailed cautionary announcements to be published, whereas the TRP requires that, given that cautionary announcements are published prior to the release of the firm intention announcement, cautionary announcements in respect of affected transactions (including take-private transactions) do not include the level of detail typically included in a firm intention announcement.

Engagement with the target should be carefully managed in order to ensure that its disclosure obligations are recognised but that announcements are not released at junctures in the process which are likely to introduce necessary execution risk.

Transaction structuring

In order to procure the delisting of the target from the JSE, an offer must be made to all the target’s shareholders enabling them to exit for cash. The two primary transaction structures utilised for this purpose are (i) a “scheme of arrangement” (scheme) in terms of section 114 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 (Companies Act); and (ii) a “general offer” (sometimes referred to as a “tender offer”).


A scheme is an arrangement between the target and its shareholders which binds all shareholders, irrespective of whether each individual shareholder actually supported the scheme.

In the context of a take-private transaction, the primary benefits of a scheme (as opposed to a general offer) are that:

  • the scheme binds all shareholders and not only those who support the scheme. Therefore, minority shareholders’ shares may be expropriated as part of the scheme and the administrative burden of minority shareholders retaining their holdings in the delisted vehicle is avoided;
  • the termination of the target’s listing does not require approval by the target’s shareholders or the JSE, rather the delisting occurs as a feature of the scheme; and
  • while the target’s independent board will retain an independent expert to report on the fairness and reasonableness of the offer (which will be distributed to shareholders) there is no requirement that the offer be fair or reasonable in order to be implemented and competently delist the target.

If a scheme is to be proposed, the following should be considered:

  • a scheme cannot be proposed by the offeror directly, but rather must be proposed by the independent board of the target. Accordingly, the target independent board must agree to propose the scheme (which it is entitled not to do) in order for the scheme to get off the ground;
  • a scheme requires the support of at least 75% of shareholders, excluding the offeror, its related persons and any parties acting in concert with the offeror; and
  • if minority shareholders oppose the scheme but the scheme is approved by the requisite 75% majority nonetheless, the minorities will be entitled to:
    • if the scheme was opposed by ≥15% of shareholders, require that the target make application to court to approve the scheme (thereby causing a time delay, additional cost and risk that the transaction is not approved by the court); and / or
    • demand that the target make a separate offer for their shares at a “fair value” in terms of section 164 of the Companies Act. It is possible to mitigate against these risks by making the scheme subject to appropriate conditions.

General offer

In the context of a take-private transaction, the benefits of a general offer are that:

  • The target’s board is not required to approve, sanction or propose the transaction, meaning that the transaction may be launched even where the target’s board opposes the transaction.
  • The general offer does not require any shareholder approval or minimum acceptance. The offeror may elect to impose a minimum take-up condition, but this is discretionary.
  • Where acceptances by ≥90% of offeree shareholders is obtained, the compulsory squeeze out mechanism in terms of which the offeror can squeeze-out minorities that rejected the general offer may be utilised (see section 124 of the Companies Act). Of course, this is a higher threshold than the 75% required to approve a scheme, but may be valuable where a general offer construct is adopted due to opposition by the target’s board.

If a general offer construct is adopted, the following should be considered:

  • Unless the compulsory squeeze-out provisions apply (which requires ≥90% acceptances by offeree shareholders), those shareholders that reject the offer will retain their shares in the target.
  • The delisting will be contingent on (i) an outright majority (i.e. 50% + 1) of the target’s shareholders, excluding any controlling shareholder, approving the delisting; (ii) the JSE approving the delisting; and (iii) the offer being regarded as “fair” by an independent expert retained by the target’s board.
  • The delisting application is an application made to the JSE by the target. The target’s board is also required to issue a delisting circular and pronounce the offer to be fair in order for the JSE to approve the delisting. Accordingly, while launching and implementing the general offer does not require the co-operation of the target’s board, the delisting application does require such co-operation.

Given the benefits and drawbacks associated with each of these transaction structures, a take-private transaction may be structured by utilising both constructs in tandem, with the scheme being the primary transaction structure and the general offer supplementing the scheme as a fall-back offer which kicks in should the scheme fail.

Pre-requisites to making a firm offer

When the offeror submits a valid notice of firm intention to make an offer to the target, the target is required to issue a “firm intention announcement” (FIA) (see regulation 101 of the Takeover Regulations). Once the FIA has been released, the transaction is subject to a regulated process and neither the offeror nor the target can voluntarily withdraw from the transaction.

In order for an offeror to be entitled to submit its firm intention to make an offer and oblige the target to release the FIA:

  • to the extent that the transaction consideration is to be cash-settled, the offeror must provide the TRP with an acceptable confirmation of funds in the form of a bank guarantee or confirmation of funds held in escrow (see regulation 111(4) and (5) of the Takeover Regulations) (which in effect requires the offeror to have finalised all its funding arrangements relating to the transaction); and
  • the transaction must not be subject to any condition, the fulfilment of which is (i) a matter of subjective assessment; or (ii) within the control of the offeror or its directors (see regulation 96 of the Takeover Regulations). Therefore, any conditions in relation to obtaining deal finance or satisfaction with the outcome of a diligence process must be fulfilled prior to going firm on the offer.

While the release of the FIA imposes a statutory obligation on the target to proceed with the transaction, the offeror may wish to “lock-in” the target prior to the FIA being released as the offeror often invests substantial time and resources in getting the take-private transaction to FIA stage. In order to solve for this, the offeror and target may enter into an “implementation agreement”, which is a process agreement which may include:

  • certain pre-conditions relating to items such as raising deal funding and satisfaction with the results of the diligence, on the basis that pursuant to those conditions being fulfilled the target is obliged to release the FIA and propose the transaction;
  • interim conduct provisions which regulate the target’s conduct during the period preceding the date on which the transaction closes and is implemented;
  • an undertaking not to solicit competing offers, and the manner in which unsolicited competing offers, if received, will be regarded and dealt with by the target; and
  • provision for break fees, should the transaction fail to complete.

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2024 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com.