Narrowing the definition of a hybrid debt instrument

The definition of a hybrid debt instrument will be amended to exclude instruments subject to subordination arrangements.

24 Feb 2016 1 min read Special Edition Tax and Exchange Control Alert Article

The proposed amendment aims to exclude interest-bearing arrangements from the definition of hybrid debt instruments as contained in s8F of the Act, if these instruments become subject to a subordinary agreement. It is interesting to note that a distinction is made between instruments which are subordinated from the outset and subordination arrangements concluded after the issuance of the instrument. It also remains to be seen whether the exclusion will be a retrospective exclusion. The holders of these instruments might therefore remain subject to income tax regardless of the company’s ability to service its interest expense, while the company is still able to benefit from a potential income tax deduction for the interest.

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2024 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us