No place for racism in the workplace
No place for racism in the workplace
The Labour Appeal Court (LAC) issued a stern warning that it will not tolerate racism, in any form, in the workplace. In the recent case of the City of Cape Town v Freddie & Others (2016) 37 ILJ 1364 (LAC), the LAC reviewed and set aside an arbitration award in which the Arbitrator found that the employee was unfairly dismissed for making repeated unsubstantiated racist allegations about his manager.
In this case, when the employee's manager guided him on how to properly compile a particular report and instructed him to seek assistance from a fellow employee to finalise the report, the employee embarked on a bombardment of emails to the manager. In the emails he accused the manager of incompetency and of being a dismal failure. The emails were also copied to various employees. When the manager requested that the employee cease such conduct and desist from unnecessarily copying in others in the offensive and inappropriate emails, the employee accused the manager of being a racist and compared him to Hendrik Verwoerd.
The employer dismissed the employee on charges of serious misconduct in that he was grossly insubordinate, insolent and aggressive towards management and that he had sent derogatory and racially offensive emails to his manager. During the arbitration, the employee attempted to justify his allegations of racism by stating that the manager had insulted him in front of his colleagues. The employee also made unfounded allegations of being discriminated against on the basis of his race.
The employee challenged his dismissal at the Bargaining Council. The arbitrator found that there was no evidence to prove the racism alleged by the employee and that it was the employee's subjective view. The arbitrator held that the employee had shown some remorse (albeit only after receiving advice from his attorney to do so). On this basis and the employee's length of service, the arbitrator found that the employment relationship had not irretrievably broken down and that since the employer was a large organisation, the employee could be placed elsewhere. The dismissal, was according to the arbitrator, unsubstantiated. On review, the Labour Court agreed with the arbitrator and placed emphasis on what it regarded as strong mitigating factors in favour of the employee.
The Labour Court order was taken on appeal. On appeal, the LAC had to determine whether the dismissal was an appropriate sanction. The LAC noted that it was common cause that the employee was guilty of the misconduct and found that the arbitrator was wrong in ruling that the employee was remorseful as his apology was belated and only as a result of his attorney's advice.
The LAC also held that where an employee could not own up to their own misdemeanor and displayed a lack of remorse, the dismissal would be substantively fair. The LAC found that thedecision of the arbitrator in this case was not one of a reasonable decision maker and that the employee's dismissal was an appropriate sanction in the circumstances. In respect of racial slurs made by the employee that the manager "was even worse that Verwoerd" (without justification or justifiable cause), the LAC found that it constituted an offensive racial insult and was totally unacceptable in the workplace. The LAC reflected on the history of the country and stated that Hendrik Verwoerd is known as the Architect of Apartheid as he, amongst other things, implemented a system of laws which segregated the different races in our country and allowed the several atrocities to take place against black people (African, Coloured and Indians) without any impunity.
Furthermore, the LAC reiterated that the use of racist language against a person or class of persons constitutes hate speech and is prohibited in terms of the Constitution and other law in South Africa. The LAC also referred to the case of Crown Chickens (Pty) Ltd t/a Rocklands Poultry v Kapp and Others, whereinZondo JP stated:
"Within the context of labour and employment disputes this Court and the Labour Court will deal with acts of racism very firmly. This will show not only this Court’s and the Labour Court’s absolute rejection of racism but it will also show our revulsion at acts of racism in general and acts of racism in the workplace particularly."
This judgment sends a clear message to employees and employers that racist conduct and unfounded allegations of racism in the workplace is wholly unacceptable and will not be tolerated by the courts. The Labour Court and Labour Appeal Court have undertaken to deal with these types of matters with a firm hand. Employers and employees should ensure that racism in the workplace is eliminated. We advise that employers should adopt appropriate strategies and implement relevant policies in order to identify and eliminate racism in the workplace.
The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2023 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us email@example.com.
We support our clients’ strategic and operational needs by offering innovative, integrated and high quality thought leadership. To stay up to date on the latest legal developments that may potentially impact your business, subscribe to our alerts, seminar and webinar invitations.Subscribe