“Crippling” 2015 Mining Financial Provision Regulations – possible deadline extensions for likely rehabilitation liability increases and income tax penalties due to legislative riddles

The Financial Provision Regulations (2015 Regulations) publication under the National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998 (NEMA) in November 2015 was widely criticised in the media. The Chamber of Mines has stated that it could have a crippling effect on the mining industry.

26 Aug 2016 5 min read Mining and Minerals Alert Article

The criticisms particularly relate to the:

  • restrictions on using rehabilitation trust funds for only final rehabilitation liability. This includes ongoing liability for latent and residual environmental impacts that may arise in the future, which was not previously required under the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002 (MPRDA); and
  • consequences of income tax penalties that may be payable by mines under the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 (ITA) due to significant misalignment of the 2015 Regulations and ITA.

The Department of Mineral Resources (DMR) has sought to elucidate some of the issues raised by releasing a clarification note to stakeholders. However, as discussed below, this has merely resulted in more confusion and regulatory uncertainty.

Possible Extensions for Alignment Assessments

Mineral right holders (Holders) are required to compile an onerous, extensive and expensive assessment to review and align their existing financial provision provided through financial instruments under the MPRDA with the 2015 Regulations before 20 February 2017 (Alignment Assessment). Due to the significant issues arising from the 2015 Regulations and legislative amendments required to rectify this, the DMR has conveyed that this deadline will be amended to extend the period to 20 November 2017. When such amendment will occur has however not been confirmed, so Holders are still presently, due to timing constraints, required to prepare the Alignment Assessment in accordance with the 20 February 2017 deadline.

Onerous ongoing final rehabilitation liability and requirements for use of Trust Funds to protect the State or the environment?

Under the 2015 Regulations, a rehabilitation trust fund may be used as a financial provision vehicle, if it is established through a trust deed in the format set out in an Appendix to the 2015 Regulations. This is provided that trust funds are not used for financial provision required for annual rehabilitation and mine closure costs. In practice, trust funds will need to be used for financial provision required for final rehabilitation liability. This liability will now be ongoing, despite the issue of a closure certificate, under amendments to NEMA. Contributions into trust funds must now also be ceded to the DMR on mine closure. Financial guarantees would not be suitable financial provision instruments for final rehabilitation liability, as the 2015 Regulations require all new guarantees to expire when a closure certificate is issued, making it an unsuitable financial instrument for ongoing final rehabilitation liability.

Legislature’s rationale for including the requirements for final rehabilitation liability and ceding trust funds to the DMR was that only sixty percent of operational mines presently have adequate financial provision. This does not include underground or surface water liabilities, which amounts to a large percentage of historical unaccounted for liability; and has resulted in massive State liability and potentially will lead to significant indirect liability for the mining industry. The DMR has therefore been reluctant to issue closure certificates to mines, as liability is then transferred to State, despite the DMR not being known in practice to commonly undertake rehabilitation. Mines have therefore been unable to obtain financial provision refunds. The last known statistics on closure certificate are from 2014: of the 575 closure certificates under review only 159 were issued. Closure certificates still remain a rare sight in practice.

Income tax penalties for mines due to misalignment to ITA

Trusts funds established under s37A of the ITA (s37A Trust Funds) have been utilised by Holders as a vehicle to house their financial provision because of the tax benefit provided. Under ITA a s37A Trust’s sole object must be to apply all funds to mine closure rehabilitation and final rehabilitation. It does not envisage financial provision for annual rehabilitation, which is a new requirement under the 2015 Regulations. However the 2015 Regulations now prescribe that contributions to s37A Trust Funds may only be used for final rehabilitation. The 2015 Regulations’ restriction on using s37A Trust Funds for final rehabilitation has two significant consequences for Holders:

  • withdrawals from a s37A Trust to secure an alternative financial vehicle for annual rehabilitation and mine closure rehabilitation would contravene ITA, which only allows such withdrawals for direct expenses related to rehabilitation, decommissioning or closure. Any such withdrawal may therefore have significant punitive tax consequences; and
  • the 2015 Regulations’ prescribed format for s37A Trust Funds does not conform to the 2015 Regulations and s37A as it, inter alia, erroneously allows funds in the trust to be allocated to annual rehabilitation, mine closure rehabilitation and final rehabilitation, which goes beyond the limitations of the 2015 Regulations and ITA. Tax benefits for s37A Trust Funds will therefore no longer apply to trust funds established in the prescribed format.

This will likely have significant economic implications for mining companies.

Non-compliance with the 2015 Regulations is also a criminal offence and both the Holder and its directors may be held criminally liable.

Given the significant misalignment of ITA and the 2015 Regulations, further legislative amendments will be required. A National Treasury and Department of Environmental Affairs meeting has been promised for a while to expedite a solution. When this meeting will be forthcoming is uncertain and any amendments will require a relatively lengthy regulatory process, particularly if parliamentary approval is required to amend ITA. This is unlikely to occur before the 20 February 2017 deadline.

DMR Clarification provides little clarification

The DMR has clarified that the limitations on using trust funds applies to Holders. Holders will therefore need to change their financial instruments for rehabilitation liability shortly after the DMR has approved their Alignment Assessments that are due by 20 February 2017.

It has however confusingly also conveyed that “existing trusts can be managed as before”. This implies that trust funds can be used for closure rehabilitation, which contradicts the 2015 Regulations. If this is the position, there is no clarity on:

a)    whether contributions for closure costs can still be made after the Alignment Assessment; and

b)    how the resultant consequences of the income tax penalties Holders may incur will be remedied if they need to draw from a trust fund for annual rehabilitation.

The 2015 Regulations therefore remains yet another riddle produced under the environmental legislative framework for regulating mines.

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2024 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com.