Competition Tribunal unconditionally approves merger between Ethos and Nampak

27 May 2015 1 min read Article

The Competition Tribunal, on 1 April 2015, approved a merger in which Ethos Private Equity Fund VI (Ethos) acquired control over the Nampak Corrugated and Nampak Tissue business divisions of Nampak Limited (Nampak).

Despite concerns being advanced by trade unions regarding a perceived likely impact on employment of the target businesses' employees, the Tribunal could not impose any employment related conditions on the merger without any evidence to substantiate that the merger would negatively affect employment. The Commission's hands were further tied by the various submissions made by the merging parties confirming that the transaction would not result in any unskilled or semi-skilled employees being retrenched.

The Tribunal did, however, hold the merging parties to an undertaking to refrain from any merger specific retrenchments for two years after the merger, save for two executive employees who would not transfer to the acquiring firm.

The Tribunal has, in this case, demonstrated that it will not impose a merger specific moratorium on retrenchments solely on the basis of unsubstantiated concerns of trade unions. Where the Competition Commission has no reason to discredit the merging parties' submission that a merger will not give rise to employment related public interest effects, the Tribunal has no reason to impose employment conditions where there is no justification for discrediting the merging parties' submission that a merger will not give rise to employment related public interest effects.

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2024 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us