Our team acts for a leading independent data, voice and intellectual property provider

Home
Home
Our team acts for a leading independent data, voice and intellectual property provider

Our team acts for a leading independent data, voice and intellectual property provider

21 Aug 2019 1 min read Featured work

Related services

Dispute Resolution

Our team acts for a leading independent data, voice and intellectual property provider in a review brought by a state entity challenging the lawfulness of a substantial infrastructure which is in an advanced stage of its implementation. The case includes difficult questions of administrative law as far as the tender is concerned; the misuse of corruption legislation; and a constitutional challenge to the very existence of the state entity.

You might also be interested in

11 Dec 2025

by Brigitta Mangale

Standing united against Gender-Based Violence

Brigitta Mangale, Director in the Pro Bono & Human Rights practice, was recently featured in Business Media Magazine, where she discussed “Standing united against Gender-Based Violence.”

1 min read

27 May 2025

by Jackwell Feris

Opportunities for green industrial development in key sectors

Building on the continent’s ambitious vision for green industrial development, Africa presents a compelling landscape of concrete investment opportunities across several pivotal sectors. These opportunities are not merely about environmental responsibility; they represent significant economic potential, driven by global demand for sustainable solutions and Africa’s rich natural endowments. Harnessing these areas is key to job creation, technological advancement and long-term prosperity.

3 min read

13 Aug 2025

by Njeri Wagacha and Serah Mulatya

Unlocking value through successful private equity exits in Africa

The African Private Capital Association’s (AVCA) 2024 Activity Report , published in April 2025, revealed that Africa experienced a remarkable surge in exit activity, with 63 exits marking a significant 47% year-on-year increase since 2022. The resurgence in private equity (PE) exits was driven by two key factors: investors delaying exits for a more favourable economic climate, creating a backlog of companies now exiting the market; and increasing demands from limited partners (LP) to return capital, prompting private capital firms to pursue strategic exits across their portfolios.

Corporate & Commercial Law

5 min read

12 Mar 2025

by Yvonne Mkefa, Leila Moosa, Kgodisho Phashe, Lee Masuku and Taryn York

Webinar Recording | Labour Law Reforms: Key proposed amendments and its implications

CDH experts hosted a webinar to discuss the Draft Code of Good Practice on Dismissals and the latest proposed legislative amendments following negotiations at NEDLAC.

Environmental Law

49:13 Minutes

11 Jun 2025

by Tayyibah Suliman, Sadia Rizvi and Pebetsi Letsoalo

Implications for crypto asset service providers from High Court ruling on crypto and exchange control

In the case of Standard Bank of South Africa v South African Reserve Bank and Others (047643/2023) ZAGPPHC 481 (delivered 15 May 2025), the Gauteng High Court ruled that South Africa’s current Exchange Control Regulations do not apply to cryptocurrency transactions. Although the ruling has been suspended pending an appeal, the judgment carries significant implications for crypto asset service providers, crypto exchanges, fintech, and institutional players operating in the crypto asset space.

Technology & Communications

4 min read

13 Aug 2025

by Lucinde Rhoodie and Roxanne Bain

When companies behave as quasi-partnerships – A cautionary tale of oppression

The recent decision of the Eastern Cape High Court in Ungerer v Ferreira and Others (4475/2024) ZAECQBHC 13 (7 May 2025) reinforces the principles relating to the rights of shareholders in closely held companies, the concept of quasi-partnerships, and the remedies available under section 163 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 (Companies Act). The judgment is particularly relevant for business partners in private companies who have not reduced their mutual understandings to writing, and for those seeking clarity on what constitutes oppressive or unfairly prejudicial conduct when business relationships break down.

Corporate & Commercial Law

4 min read